Lessons learned from developing the worldwide IEQ guidelines database

Indoor environmental quality (IEQ) guidelines and standards aim to ensure consistent, safe and healthy indoor spaces by providing clear benchmarks for air quality, lighting, thermal comfort and acoustics. Many countries and organizations have established their own IEQ regulations and standards or guidelines, but discrepancies in parameters, definitions, methods, and updating frequency often cause them to lag behind the latest scientific and technological advancements, potentially limiting their effectiveness. Researchers and practitioners advocate for the simplification and unification of IEQ guidelines, though risking overlooking geographical and cultural specificities. To address these challenges, and to help preserve and use current knowledge, an open database compiling worldwide IEQ guidelines was developed, ensuring equitable access to up-to-date information. The database covers four key IEQ domains, indoor air quality (IAQ), thermal comfort, acoustics, and lighting, as well as two related domains: ventilation and outdoor air quality (OAQ). Ventilation is a critical factor influencing most of the other IEQ domains, while OAQ guidelines are sometimes used in the absence of indoor-specific guidelines. Each of the six resulting tables includes both mandatory governmental regulations and voluntary guidelines, along with internationally recognized standards for broader relevance. This paper summarizes key lessons learned from database development and data collection efforts over the past five years. Practical IEQ guidelines and standards balance health and wellbeing outcomes with environmental, economic, and comfort considerations. Guidelines and standards can work best when science-based, adaptable to regional contexts, and structured with clear, measurable parameters, such as exposure limits, timeframes, and validated measurement methods. Collaboration between scientific research, technological advancements, and policy development can ensure regulations remain effective and up to date. To increase compliance and raise public awareness, the database consolidates and shares existing international guidelines and standards, supporting global alignment with best practices while accommodating resource constraints and regional specificities. • Data were collected from 48 countries, significant geographical and population-based coverages • Updates frequency varies by country, some data may be based on old knowledge • Indoor and outdoor air quality guidelines are more represented than other areas, biological safety less represented • Use of different units, averaging times, monitoring tools, etc. makes it difficult to compare • Objectives (health, comfort, productivity or environmental) are often unclear • Disparity between guidelines considering occupational vs. public health

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indoor Environments
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indenv.2025.100124
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lessons learned from developing the worldwide IEQ guidelines database

1 citations
Indoor Environments
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
4.33
article

Lessons learned from developing the worldwide IEQ guidelines database

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Indoor environmental quality (IEQ) guidelines and standards aim to ensure consistent, safe and healthy indoor spaces by providing clear benchmarks for air quality, lighting, thermal comfort and acoustics. Many countries and organizations have established their own IEQ regulations and standards or guidelines, but discrepancies in parameters, definitions, methods, and updating frequency often cause them to lag behind the latest scientific and technological advancements, potentially limiting their effectiveness. Researchers and practitioners advocate for the simplification and unification of IEQ guidelines, though risking overlooking geographical and cultural specificities. To address these challenges, and to help preserve and use current knowledge, an open database compiling worldwide IEQ guidelines was developed, ensuring equitable access to up-to-date information. The database covers four key IEQ domains, indoor air quality (IAQ), thermal comfort, acoustics, and lighting, as well as two related domains: ventilation and outdoor air quality (OAQ). Ventilation is a critical factor influencing most of the other IEQ domains, while OAQ guidelines are sometimes used in the absence of indoor-specific guidelines. Each of the six resulting tables includes both mandatory governmental regulations and voluntary guidelines, along with internationally recognized standards for broader relevance. This paper summarizes key lessons learned from database development and data collection efforts over the past five years. Practical IEQ guidelines and standards balance health and wellbeing outcomes with environmental, economic, and comfort considerations. Guidelines and standards can work best when science-based, adaptable to regional contexts, and structured with clear, measurable parameters, such as exposure limits, timeframes, and validated measurement methods. Collaboration between scientific research, technological advancements, and policy development can ensure regulations remain effective and up to date. To increase compliance and raise public awareness, the database consolidates and shares existing international guidelines and standards, supporting global alignment with best practices while accommodating resource constraints and regional specificities. • Data were collected from 48 countries, significant geographical and population-based coverages • Updates frequency varies by country, some data may be based on old knowledge • Indoor and outdoor air quality guidelines are more represented than other areas, biological safety less represented • Use of different units, averaging times, monitoring tools, etc. makes it difficult to compare • Objectives (health, comfort, productivity or environmental) are often unclear • Disparity between guidelines considering occupational vs. public health

Indoor EnvironmentsVol. 2(4)
Turku University of Applied Sciences (FI), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (US), University of Surrey (GB), Public Health England (GB), ETH Zurich (CH), Sustainable Energy Systems (United Kingdom) (GB), Lublin University of Technology (PL), University of Oklahoma (US), University of Tulsa (US), University of Oulu (FI)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
4.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.