[18F]FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 3.0

The purpose of these guidelines is to assist physicians in recommending, performing, interpreting and reporting the results of [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT for oncological imaging of adult and paediatric patients. PET is a quantitative imaging technique and therefore requires a common quality control (QC)/quality assurance (QA) procedure to maintain the accuracy and precision of quantitation. Repeatability and reproducibility are two essential requirements for any quantitative measurement and/or imaging biomarker. Repeatability relates to the uncertainty in obtaining the same result in the same patient when they are examined more than once on the same system. However, imaging biomarkers should also have adequate reproducibility, i.e. the ability to yield the same result in the same patient when that patient is examined on different systems and at different imaging sites. Adequate repeatability and reproducibility are essential for the clinical management of patients and the use of [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT within multicentre trials. A common standardised imaging procedure will help promote the appropriate use of [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT imaging and increase the value of publications and, therefore, their contribution to evidence-based medicine. Moreover, consistency in numerical values between platforms and imaging centres that acquire the data will potentially enhance the role of semi-quantitative and quantitative image interpretation. Precision and accuracy are additionally important as [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT is used to evaluate tumour response as well as for diagnosis, prognosis and staging. Therefore, both the previous and these new guidelines specifically aim to achieve standardised uptake value harmonisation in multicentre settings.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The EANM Journal
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eanmj.2025.100006
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

[18F]FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 3.0

7 citations
The EANM Journal
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
17.37
article

[18F]FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 3.0

article en
7 citations

Abstract

The purpose of these guidelines is to assist physicians in recommending, performing, interpreting and reporting the results of [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT for oncological imaging of adult and paediatric patients. PET is a quantitative imaging technique and therefore requires a common quality control (QC)/quality assurance (QA) procedure to maintain the accuracy and precision of quantitation. Repeatability and reproducibility are two essential requirements for any quantitative measurement and/or imaging biomarker. Repeatability relates to the uncertainty in obtaining the same result in the same patient when they are examined more than once on the same system. However, imaging biomarkers should also have adequate reproducibility, i.e. the ability to yield the same result in the same patient when that patient is examined on different systems and at different imaging sites. Adequate repeatability and reproducibility are essential for the clinical management of patients and the use of [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT within multicentre trials. A common standardised imaging procedure will help promote the appropriate use of [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT imaging and increase the value of publications and, therefore, their contribution to evidence-based medicine. Moreover, consistency in numerical values between platforms and imaging centres that acquire the data will potentially enhance the role of semi-quantitative and quantitative image interpretation. Precision and accuracy are additionally important as [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT is used to evaluate tumour response as well as for diagnosis, prognosis and staging. Therefore, both the previous and these new guidelines specifically aim to achieve standardised uptake value harmonisation in multicentre settings.

The EANM JournalVol. 1
University of Iowa (US), University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Antwerp (BE), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), King's College London (GB), South Essex Partnership University Foundation NHS Trust (GB), Catharina Ziekenhuis (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Maastricht University (NL), National Cancer Center (US), Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Antwerp University Hospital (BE), Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust (GB), Essen University Hospital (DE), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT), Hospital San Pedro (ES), Center for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (ES), Servicio Cántabro de Salud (ES), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis (NL), University of Rostock (DE), Medical University of Vienna (AT), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
17.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.