Predicting youth care between 0 to 4 years of age: a 2015–2019 Dutch population register data study

• Youth care services support families with problems with the upbringing of children. • In the Netherlands, these services are increasingly overburdened. • No prior attempts to predict youth care have been reported. • We developed risk models for predicting youth care before the age of 5 years. • Risk stratification-based screening may offer relief to families before escalation. Youth care services support families facing problems with raising children. Use of such services may be avoided if preventative support were offered. We developed youth care risk prediction models to enable risk stratification approaches. We used Dutch registry data of births between 2015–2019, including neighbourhood characteristics, socioeconomic status, parental health and behaviours, past birth outcomes, current birth outcomes, and household characteristics. The primary outcome was use of youth care services between the ages of 0–4 years. Multivariable Cox regression models were derived for assessment moments one year before birth, at birth, one year after birth, and two years after birth (models 1–4, respectively). The full cohort consisted of 776,559 Dutch births, of which 32,290 underwent at least one youth care trajectory (4.2 %). Each full model performed equivalently to the respective parsimonious model. Parsimonious model 1 achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.760 (95 % confidence interval = 0.757–0.763). Model performance improved minimally at each subsequent assessment moment, reaching an AUC of 0.798 (0.794–0.801) for parsimonious model 4. The strongest predictors included prior youth care, parental educational level, maternal psychiatric medication prescription, and maternal job status. When classifying 10 % of the cohort with the highest risk of any youth care as positive, the negative predictive value was high (≥0.972) and the positive predictive value was low (≤0.164). If the consequences of false positive tests can be mitigated, then screening may offer relief to families before involvement of the over-encumbered youth care services.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children and Youth Services Review
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108600
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting youth care between 0 to 4 years of age: a 2015–2019 Dutch population register data study

Children and Youth Services Review
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Predicting youth care between 0 to 4 years of age: a 2015–2019 Dutch population register data study

article en

Abstract

• Youth care services support families with problems with the upbringing of children. • In the Netherlands, these services are increasingly overburdened. • No prior attempts to predict youth care have been reported. • We developed risk models for predicting youth care before the age of 5 years. • Risk stratification-based screening may offer relief to families before escalation. Youth care services support families facing problems with raising children. Use of such services may be avoided if preventative support were offered. We developed youth care risk prediction models to enable risk stratification approaches. We used Dutch registry data of births between 2015–2019, including neighbourhood characteristics, socioeconomic status, parental health and behaviours, past birth outcomes, current birth outcomes, and household characteristics. The primary outcome was use of youth care services between the ages of 0–4 years. Multivariable Cox regression models were derived for assessment moments one year before birth, at birth, one year after birth, and two years after birth (models 1–4, respectively). The full cohort consisted of 776,559 Dutch births, of which 32,290 underwent at least one youth care trajectory (4.2 %). Each full model performed equivalently to the respective parsimonious model. Parsimonious model 1 achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.760 (95 % confidence interval = 0.757–0.763). Model performance improved minimally at each subsequent assessment moment, reaching an AUC of 0.798 (0.794–0.801) for parsimonious model 4. The strongest predictors included prior youth care, parental educational level, maternal psychiatric medication prescription, and maternal job status. When classifying 10 % of the cohort with the highest risk of any youth care as positive, the negative predictive value was high (≥0.972) and the positive predictive value was low (≤0.164). If the consequences of false positive tests can be mitigated, then screening may offer relief to families before involvement of the over-encumbered youth care services.

Children and Youth Services ReviewVol. 179
Leiden University (NL), Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), GGD Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.