THE CONFLICT BETWEEN SOCIETY AND THE INDIVIDUAL IN SAID AHMAD'S UFQ AND GEORGE ORWELL'S 1984

This article explores the complex relationship between society and the individual in Said Ahmad’s novel Ufq and George Orwell’s 1984. Both writers, though from different cultural and historical contexts, address the tension between personal freedom and collective control. Said Ahmad reflects the moral and social challenges of Uzbek society during the Soviet era, emphasizing the individual’s struggle against ideological conformity. Orwell, in contrast, portrays the extreme consequences of totalitarian power, exposing mechanisms of surveillance, censorship, and thought control. The comparative analysis highlights universal motifs of resistance, conformity, and identity under oppressive systems. By examining ideological motives, the article uncovers how literature functions as a critical tool to question authority, preserve human dignity, and reveal hidden contradictions in social life. Ultimately, both texts illuminate the timeless struggle between power structures and individual autonomy

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17192479
Primary Topic
Agriculture and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE CONFLICT BETWEEN SOCIETY AND THE INDIVIDUAL IN SAID AHMAD'S UFQ AND GEORGE ORWELL'S 1984

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Agriculture and Social Issues
article

THE CONFLICT BETWEEN SOCIETY AND THE INDIVIDUAL IN SAID AHMAD'S UFQ AND GEORGE ORWELL'S 1984

article en

Abstract

This article explores the complex relationship between society and the individual in Said Ahmad’s novel Ufq and George Orwell’s 1984. Both writers, though from different cultural and historical contexts, address the tension between personal freedom and collective control. Said Ahmad reflects the moral and social challenges of Uzbek society during the Soviet era, emphasizing the individual’s struggle against ideological conformity. Orwell, in contrast, portrays the extreme consequences of totalitarian power, exposing mechanisms of surveillance, censorship, and thought control. The comparative analysis highlights universal motifs of resistance, conformity, and identity under oppressive systems. By examining ideological motives, the article uncovers how literature functions as a critical tool to question authority, preserve human dignity, and reveal hidden contradictions in social life. Ultimately, both texts illuminate the timeless struggle between power structures and individual autonomy

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Agriculture and Social Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

THE CONFLICT BETWEEN SOCIETY AND THE INDIVIDUAL IN SAID AHMAD'S UFQ AND GEORGE ORWELL'S 1984 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS