Anthropocentric International Relations: Reclaiming the Metaphysical and the Spiritual ‘Non-human’

In the midst of an anthropocentric Earth System —marked by planetary climate emergencies resulting from geologic human interferences—and the anarchic International System politically operated by self-serving states, lie communities whose relationships with nature have rendered them both marginal and frontline actors. As communities that have historically and symbiotically been enmeshed with the ecosystems they inhabit, indigenous communities often do not adhere or conform to the narrow categorizations and governing logics of the modern nation-state. This systemic invisibalization paradoxically situates them at the peripheral margins of dominant disciplinary discourses and governance principles and mechanisms, while they find themselves at the frontlines of developmental and ecological crises. This article discusses whether and how an Anthropocentric International Relations can create space for indigenous communities. In order to effectively do so, it advocates for giving credence in the discipline and practice of International Relations—to the metaphysical, and the spiritual, ‘non-human’.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Studies
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00208817251371861
Primary Topic
Geodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anthropocentric International Relations: Reclaiming the Metaphysical and the Spiritual ‘Non-human’

International Studies
Geodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures
article

Anthropocentric International Relations: Reclaiming the Metaphysical and the Spiritual ‘Non-human’

article en

Abstract

In the midst of an anthropocentric Earth System —marked by planetary climate emergencies resulting from geologic human interferences—and the anarchic International System politically operated by self-serving states, lie communities whose relationships with nature have rendered them both marginal and frontline actors. As communities that have historically and symbiotically been enmeshed with the ecosystems they inhabit, indigenous communities often do not adhere or conform to the narrow categorizations and governing logics of the modern nation-state. This systemic invisibalization paradoxically situates them at the peripheral margins of dominant disciplinary discourses and governance principles and mechanisms, while they find themselves at the frontlines of developmental and ecological crises. This article discusses whether and how an Anthropocentric International Relations can create space for indigenous communities. In order to effectively do so, it advocates for giving credence in the discipline and practice of International Relations—to the metaphysical, and the spiritual, ‘non-human’.

International StudiesVol. 61(4)
South Asian University (IN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Geodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Anthropocentric International Relations: Reclaiming the Metaphysical and the Spiritual ‘Non-human’ · International Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS