Patient and staff perceptions of transdisciplinary stroke assessment: Insights into experience, team trust, and confidence in each other from a mixed method study

Transdisciplinary models of care combine clinical knowledge and skills from multiple disciplines and can help healthcare teams reorganise and optimise service delivery. However, there are many factors that could impact the success of transdisciplinary initiatives. The aim of the study was to understand factors impacting the implementation of a transdisciplinary stroke assessment by allied health professionals. A mixed-method exploratory design was used. Surveys, focus groups and individual interviews were completed at multiple time points. Data analysis was completed in two stages. First, key survey results were descriptively summarised for presentation in focus groups and interviews. Second, inductive content analysis was completed with NVivo 12 Plus software. Patient experience with the assessment was related to repetition, length, and thoroughness. Staff were satisfied with using the transdisciplinary assessment due to workload-sharing benefits. The main reasons for team trust were the consistency of assessment administration and results (i.e., trust in each other), perceived benefits of the transdisciplinary assessment (i.e., trust in the assessment), and facilitators such as prospective conversations about trust. Staff confidence in their own and other’s ability to safely and effectively use the transdisciplinary assessment was linked to competence and supported by training, observation of colleagues, and familiarity with assessment tasks. The study provides important insights that could inform the planning and implementation of future transdisciplinary approaches in healthcare settings. • Successfully implemented transdisciplinary models can reduce service duplication • Patient experience with the assessment was related to repetition and length • Staff experience improves with a collectivist focus on workload sharing benefits • Team trust is built through competency training and prospective trust conversations • Confidence in the transdisciplinary assessment is linked to staff competence

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2025.100767
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient and staff perceptions of transdisciplinary stroke assessment: Insights into experience, team trust, and confidence in each other from a mixed method study

Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Patient and staff perceptions of transdisciplinary stroke assessment: Insights into experience, team trust, and confidence in each other from a mixed method study

article en

Abstract

Transdisciplinary models of care combine clinical knowledge and skills from multiple disciplines and can help healthcare teams reorganise and optimise service delivery. However, there are many factors that could impact the success of transdisciplinary initiatives. The aim of the study was to understand factors impacting the implementation of a transdisciplinary stroke assessment by allied health professionals. A mixed-method exploratory design was used. Surveys, focus groups and individual interviews were completed at multiple time points. Data analysis was completed in two stages. First, key survey results were descriptively summarised for presentation in focus groups and interviews. Second, inductive content analysis was completed with NVivo 12 Plus software. Patient experience with the assessment was related to repetition, length, and thoroughness. Staff were satisfied with using the transdisciplinary assessment due to workload-sharing benefits. The main reasons for team trust were the consistency of assessment administration and results (i.e., trust in each other), perceived benefits of the transdisciplinary assessment (i.e., trust in the assessment), and facilitators such as prospective conversations about trust. Staff confidence in their own and other’s ability to safely and effectively use the transdisciplinary assessment was linked to competence and supported by training, observation of colleagues, and familiarity with assessment tasks. The study provides important insights that could inform the planning and implementation of future transdisciplinary approaches in healthcare settings. • Successfully implemented transdisciplinary models can reduce service duplication • Patient experience with the assessment was related to repetition and length • Staff experience improves with a collectivist focus on workload sharing benefits • Team trust is built through competency training and prospective trust conversations • Confidence in the transdisciplinary assessment is linked to staff competence

Journal of Interprofessional Education & PracticeVol. 41
Griffith University (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Mater Research (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.