Women, sexual orientation, gender identity, and constitutional developments in Hungary

Abstract In this article, we aim to offer a nuanced understanding of how different Hungarian constitutions have shaped the gender order, and what contextual variables have influenced this process. Drawing on an understanding of the state-socialist past and the dynamics between constitutional reforms and the jurisprudence of the Hungarian Constitutional Court—operating under both liberal and illiberal constitutions—we set forth the following arguments. Even though one might assume that the decline of the rule of law, the deterioration of democracy and human rights protection, and judicial capture facilitated by major constitutional changes would also cause a shift in the gender-related constitutional architecture and the jurisprudence of constitutional courts, an analysis of the Hungarian constitutions and the case law of the Hungarian Constitutional Court shows that this is not necessarily the case. The liberal Hungarian constitution (1989–2011), due to the lack of related definitions, did not shape the content of gender-related concepts; at the same time, both the Parliament and the Constitutional Court tended to take a traditionalist position. The adoption and successive amendments of the illiberal constitution (since 2012), which introduced increasing numbers of provisions related to gender issues that affirm earlier traditional views and direct the jurisprudence of the Hungarian Constitutional Court, have not facilitated equality between the sexes. It nonetheless serves as a preemptive barrier to claims by sexual minorities. The Hungarian Constitutional Court, under both liberal democratic and illiberal governments, has consistently followed a traditionalist position, with relatively little deterioration of its already established case law, which has been unreceptive to the new generation of gender-related concepts. To support these claims, we discuss constitutional developments in the areas of equality between women and men, abortion, private-life relationships, the concept of marriage and family, and self-identified gender.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Constitutional Law
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaf031
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Women, sexual orientation, gender identity, and constitutional developments in Hungary

International Journal of Constitutional Law
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
article

Women, sexual orientation, gender identity, and constitutional developments in Hungary

article en

Abstract

Abstract In this article, we aim to offer a nuanced understanding of how different Hungarian constitutions have shaped the gender order, and what contextual variables have influenced this process. Drawing on an understanding of the state-socialist past and the dynamics between constitutional reforms and the jurisprudence of the Hungarian Constitutional Court—operating under both liberal and illiberal constitutions—we set forth the following arguments. Even though one might assume that the decline of the rule of law, the deterioration of democracy and human rights protection, and judicial capture facilitated by major constitutional changes would also cause a shift in the gender-related constitutional architecture and the jurisprudence of constitutional courts, an analysis of the Hungarian constitutions and the case law of the Hungarian Constitutional Court shows that this is not necessarily the case. The liberal Hungarian constitution (1989–2011), due to the lack of related definitions, did not shape the content of gender-related concepts; at the same time, both the Parliament and the Constitutional Court tended to take a traditionalist position. The adoption and successive amendments of the illiberal constitution (since 2012), which introduced increasing numbers of provisions related to gender issues that affirm earlier traditional views and direct the jurisprudence of the Hungarian Constitutional Court, have not facilitated equality between the sexes. It nonetheless serves as a preemptive barrier to claims by sexual minorities. The Hungarian Constitutional Court, under both liberal democratic and illiberal governments, has consistently followed a traditionalist position, with relatively little deterioration of its already established case law, which has been unreceptive to the new generation of gender-related concepts. To support these claims, we discuss constitutional developments in the areas of equality between women and men, abortion, private-life relationships, the concept of marriage and family, and self-identified gender.

International Journal of Constitutional LawVol. 23(2)
Eötvös Loránd University (HU), Mykolas Romeris University (LT), Institute for Legal Studies (HU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.