Effect of Informational Videos on Vaccine Perceptions Among Unvaccinated Individuals: A Randomized Educational Intervention

Introduction By 2022, COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the US had plateaued. We tested whether unvaccinated individuals in 2022 were wilfully avoiding vaccine information, or if they would voluntarily accept vaccine education. Methods In this double-blind, parallel, randomised educational study, we recruited US residents to participate in an online survey-experiment between January 27, 2022 and February 25, 2022. Subjects were first screened for vaccination status. Unvaccinated individuals were then separately invited into the survey. We developed video-based informational interventions that provide detailed, yet easy-to-grasp, explanations of mRNA vaccine technology, development, testing and safety protocols, and potential side effects. Participants were randomised into three groups: (1) a control group who watched an unrelated placebo video, (2) a “video-optional” group for whom every informational video was optional, and (3) a “video-required” group for whom the vaccine-technology video was mandatory, but all other videos were optional. Primary endpoints were future COVID-19 vaccine uptake intentions, COVID-19 vaccine efficacy beliefs, and COVID-19 vaccine side-effect concerns (all measured on a 100-point scale). Secondary endpoints measured information-seeking behaviour and trust in health care professionals. The educational study was registered on ISRCTN (ISRCTN98065390), and pre-registered on the AEA RCT registry (AEARCTR0008909).Results Relative to control (3,014 participants), the video-optional group (1,320 participants) exhibited a 0.09 standard deviation (95% CI: 0.02-0.15) improvement in COVID-19 vaccine intentions, a 0.10 SD (95% CI: 0.03-0.17) improvement in COVID-19 vaccine-efficacy beliefs, and a 0.14 SD (95% CI: 0.07-0.21) improvement in COVID-19 side-effect concerns. The video-required group (2,756 participants) yielded improvements, relative to control, of 0.07, 0.18, and 0.08 SDs in the respective categories (95% CIs: 0.02-0.12, 0.13-0.23, 0.03-0.13). 55-60% of the participants in both treatment groups watched optional videos.Conclusions Wilful avoidance of vaccine information does not appear to explain entrenched vaccine hesitancy. Impartial and detailed information may be an effective communication and policy tool.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Published
2025-06-17
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Informational Videos on Vaccine Perceptions Among Unvaccinated Individuals: A Randomized Educational Intervention

Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Asthma and respiratory diseases
article

Effect of Informational Videos on Vaccine Perceptions Among Unvaccinated Individuals: A Randomized Educational Intervention

article en

Abstract

Introduction By 2022, COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the US had plateaued. We tested whether unvaccinated individuals in 2022 were wilfully avoiding vaccine information, or if they would voluntarily accept vaccine education. Methods In this double-blind, parallel, randomised educational study, we recruited US residents to participate in an online survey-experiment between January 27, 2022 and February 25, 2022. Subjects were first screened for vaccination status. Unvaccinated individuals were then separately invited into the survey. We developed video-based informational interventions that provide detailed, yet easy-to-grasp, explanations of mRNA vaccine technology, development, testing and safety protocols, and potential side effects. Participants were randomised into three groups: (1) a control group who watched an unrelated placebo video, (2) a “video-optional” group for whom every informational video was optional, and (3) a “video-required” group for whom the vaccine-technology video was mandatory, but all other videos were optional. Primary endpoints were future COVID-19 vaccine uptake intentions, COVID-19 vaccine efficacy beliefs, and COVID-19 vaccine side-effect concerns (all measured on a 100-point scale). Secondary endpoints measured information-seeking behaviour and trust in health care professionals. The educational study was registered on ISRCTN (ISRCTN98065390), and pre-registered on the AEA RCT registry (AEARCTR0008909).Results Relative to control (3,014 participants), the video-optional group (1,320 participants) exhibited a 0.09 standard deviation (95% CI: 0.02-0.15) improvement in COVID-19 vaccine intentions, a 0.10 SD (95% CI: 0.03-0.17) improvement in COVID-19 vaccine-efficacy beliefs, and a 0.14 SD (95% CI: 0.07-0.21) improvement in COVID-19 side-effect concerns. The video-required group (2,756 participants) yielded improvements, relative to control, of 0.07, 0.18, and 0.08 SDs in the respective categories (95% CIs: 0.02-0.12, 0.13-0.23, 0.03-0.13). 55-60% of the participants in both treatment groups watched optional videos.Conclusions Wilful avoidance of vaccine information does not appear to explain entrenched vaccine hesitancy. Impartial and detailed information may be an effective communication and policy tool.

Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.