The Conceptual Classification of Environmental Racism

This paper explores the significant influence of classification systems on public discourse and policy responses, centered on a case study of the contentious narrative of environmental racism in Brazil during the heavy rains in Rio de Janeiro in January 2024. We emphasize that classification systems shape societal perceptions and actions concerning environmental injustices, revealing the underlying power dynamics and negotiations. Additionally, we argue the dispute about how the concept is classified shows that disinformation narratives are used as a powerful tool in the public debate. The study contrasts the perspectives of Anielle Franco, who advocates for systemic recognition of environmental injustices and government intervention, with Kim Kataguiri, who dismisses environmental racism as a fabricated concept aimed at disrupting existing power structures. In this context, “meaningful disinformation” emerges as a narrative strategy to influence the classification debate. The analysis explores pivotal concepts such as the evolution of race and property rights, the structural advantages conferred by whiteness, and the commodification of land, all of which perpetuate systemic inequalities. By examining these themes, the paper illustrates how historical and structural factors shape contemporary environmental injustices in Brazil. The findings suggest that the case study offers valuable contributions to the discussion on classification systems and environmental disinformation.