Using machine learning classifiers together with discrimination diagrams for validation of rock classification labels

Rock classification based on chemical components is a common task in the geochemical domain. Literature recommends the Total Alkali and Silica (TAS) discrimination diagram for classifying igneous volcanic rocks by the sum of N a 2 O and K 2 O in relation to S i O 2 contents. This paper comparatively applies the TAS diagram and machine learning classification techniques to a collection of volcanic rocks from the GEOROC database. The study demonstrates a mismatch between the rock type labeled by experts in the database and rock types assigned by the TAS diagram. Despite this discrepancy, the experiments show that support vector machines are particularly promising for building decision systems for rock classification. Random forests, multi-layer perceptrons and K nearest neighbors are less suitable as rock classifiers in the study. • Automating the rock classification task is a vital challenge for geochemistry. • Support vector machines are particularly promising for rock classification. • We compared traditional TAS discrimination with machine learning classifiers. • We applied our Method to a subset of the GEOROC database.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Computing and Geosciences
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acags.2025.100288
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using machine learning classifiers together with discrimination diagrams for validation of rock classification labels

2 citations
Applied Computing and Geosciences
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
4.96
article

Using machine learning classifiers together with discrimination diagrams for validation of rock classification labels

article en
2 citations

Abstract

Rock classification based on chemical components is a common task in the geochemical domain. Literature recommends the Total Alkali and Silica (TAS) discrimination diagram for classifying igneous volcanic rocks by the sum of N a 2 O and K 2 O in relation to S i O 2 contents. This paper comparatively applies the TAS diagram and machine learning classification techniques to a collection of volcanic rocks from the GEOROC database. The study demonstrates a mismatch between the rock type labeled by experts in the database and rock types assigned by the TAS diagram. Despite this discrepancy, the experiments show that support vector machines are particularly promising for building decision systems for rock classification. Random forests, multi-layer perceptrons and K nearest neighbors are less suitable as rock classifiers in the study. • Automating the rock classification task is a vital challenge for geochemistry. • Support vector machines are particularly promising for rock classification. • We compared traditional TAS discrimination with machine learning classifiers. • We applied our Method to a subset of the GEOROC database.

Applied Computing and GeosciencesVol. 28
Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (DE), University of Wuppertal (DE), University of Bremen (DE), TU Dortmund University (DE)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.