Survival Analysis and Prognostic Factors of Endometrial Cancer- RegionalCancer Centre Experience

with rising incidence globally, especially in Asia. Prognosis depends on multiple clinicopathological factors, buttheir relative impact on survival remains to be fully clarified.Aim: To analyze survival outcomes and identify independent prognostic factors affecting overall survival inpatients with endometrial cancer treated at our institute (Regional Cancer Center).Methodology: This retrospective ‘observational study included 166 patients treated at the Department ofGynecologic Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of oncology and research institute, Bangalore, between 2014and 2019. Clinical, pathological, treatment, and follow-up data were analyzed. Survival was estimated usingKaplan-Meier methods, and prognostic factors were assessed by’ Cox ‘regression analysis.Results: The majority (86.1%) had endometrioid histology with significantly better mean overall survival (83.98months) compared to non-endometrioid tumors (50.21 months, p=0.000). Higher tumor grade and presence oflymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) were associated with poorer survival (p=0.000). LVSI showed a more thanfourfold increased risk of mortality (HR 4.736, p=0.002). Older age (≥70 years) also’ predicted worse outcomes(HR 2.593, p=0.037). Advanced stage correlated with decreased survival (p=0.000). Myometrial invasion andlymph node involvement were not independent predictors in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Histological subtype, ‘tumor grade, LVSI status, age, and stage significantly influence survival inEC patients. LVSI and age are strong independent prognostic markers and should be integral to risk stratificationand personalized treatment planning to improve outcomes.

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25258/ijpqa.16.4.40
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survival Analysis and Prognostic Factors of Endometrial Cancer- RegionalCancer Centre Experience

International Journal of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Survival Analysis and Prognostic Factors of Endometrial Cancer- RegionalCancer Centre Experience

article en

Abstract

with rising incidence globally, especially in Asia. Prognosis depends on multiple clinicopathological factors, buttheir relative impact on survival remains to be fully clarified.Aim: To analyze survival outcomes and identify independent prognostic factors affecting overall survival inpatients with endometrial cancer treated at our institute (Regional Cancer Center).Methodology: This retrospective ‘observational study included 166 patients treated at the Department ofGynecologic Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of oncology and research institute, Bangalore, between 2014and 2019. Clinical, pathological, treatment, and follow-up data were analyzed. Survival was estimated usingKaplan-Meier methods, and prognostic factors were assessed by’ Cox ‘regression analysis.Results: The majority (86.1%) had endometrioid histology with significantly better mean overall survival (83.98months) compared to non-endometrioid tumors (50.21 months, p=0.000). Higher tumor grade and presence oflymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) were associated with poorer survival (p=0.000). LVSI showed a more thanfourfold increased risk of mortality (HR 4.736, p=0.002). Older age (≥70 years) also’ predicted worse outcomes(HR 2.593, p=0.037). Advanced stage correlated with decreased survival (p=0.000). Myometrial invasion andlymph node involvement were not independent predictors in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Histological subtype, ‘tumor grade, LVSI status, age, and stage significantly influence survival inEC patients. LVSI and age are strong independent prognostic markers and should be integral to risk stratificationand personalized treatment planning to improve outcomes.

International Journal of Pharmaceutical Quality AssuranceVol. 16(04)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.