Development, Validation, and Silent Trial of a Predictive Model for Acute Care Use in Cancer Patients on Immunotherapy

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective for treating melanoma, small-cell lung cancer, and other cancers. However, 54–76% of patients on ICIs experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can lead to increased emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions. Proactively addressing these irAEs could reduce costly admissions and improve patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to develop, validate, and test via a silent trial a machine learning model for predicting ED and hospital admissions in patients receiving ICIs. Methods: The retrospective cohort study for model development and validation included 3962 adult patients from Duke University Health System who received ICIs between April 1, 2016, and July 1, 2021. The outcome of the model was ED or hospital admission within 3 weeks of ICI infusion. Performance measures included the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) at various risk thresholds. A prospective silent trial of the model including 1,417 patients was conducted from February 16, 2023, to May 30, 2024. Performance measures included sensitivity, specificity, and PPV, as well as clinical reviewers’ agreement on risk categorization. Results: The model achieved an AUROC of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.73–0.79) and an AUPRC of 0.27 (95% CI: 0.20–0.34). At the high-risk threshold, sensitivity was 0.04 and PPV was 0.59; at the medium-risk threshold, sensitivity was 0.49, and PPV was 0.27. Key features included week of immunotherapy, encounter count, albumin, pulse, and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH). In prospective validation, sensitivity was 24.6%, specificity was 94.3%, and PPV was 21.8% at the medium-risk threshold; at the high-risk threshold, sensitivity was 0.5% and PPV was 37.5%. Clinical reviewers agreed with 61.7% of risk categorizations. Conclusions; This study developed, validated, and tested a machine learning model to predict ED and hospital admissions following ICI infusion. This represents a promising strategy to proactively approach managing ICI therapy patients.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI in Precision Oncology
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2993091x251380150
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development, Validation, and Silent Trial of a Predictive Model for Acute Care Use in Cancer Patients on Immunotherapy

AI in Precision Oncology
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Development, Validation, and Silent Trial of a Predictive Model for Acute Care Use in Cancer Patients on Immunotherapy

article en

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective for treating melanoma, small-cell lung cancer, and other cancers. However, 54–76% of patients on ICIs experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can lead to increased emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions. Proactively addressing these irAEs could reduce costly admissions and improve patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to develop, validate, and test via a silent trial a machine learning model for predicting ED and hospital admissions in patients receiving ICIs. Methods: The retrospective cohort study for model development and validation included 3962 adult patients from Duke University Health System who received ICIs between April 1, 2016, and July 1, 2021. The outcome of the model was ED or hospital admission within 3 weeks of ICI infusion. Performance measures included the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) at various risk thresholds. A prospective silent trial of the model including 1,417 patients was conducted from February 16, 2023, to May 30, 2024. Performance measures included sensitivity, specificity, and PPV, as well as clinical reviewers’ agreement on risk categorization. Results: The model achieved an AUROC of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.73–0.79) and an AUPRC of 0.27 (95% CI: 0.20–0.34). At the high-risk threshold, sensitivity was 0.04 and PPV was 0.59; at the medium-risk threshold, sensitivity was 0.49, and PPV was 0.27. Key features included week of immunotherapy, encounter count, albumin, pulse, and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH). In prospective validation, sensitivity was 24.6%, specificity was 94.3%, and PPV was 21.8% at the medium-risk threshold; at the high-risk threshold, sensitivity was 0.5% and PPV was 37.5%. Clinical reviewers agreed with 61.7% of risk categorizations. Conclusions; This study developed, validated, and tested a machine learning model to predict ED and hospital admissions following ICI infusion. This represents a promising strategy to proactively approach managing ICI therapy patients.

AI in Precision OncologyVol. 2(5)
Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US), Duke University (US), Duke Institute for Health Innovation (US), Duke Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.