Hybrids models to predict density of methyl diethanolamine

• Introducing hybrid models for estimating density of Methyl Diethanolamine • Outlier detection using Leverage outlier detection algorithm • Sensitivity analysis using relevancy factor The density of Methyl Diethanolamine (MDEA), governed by temperature and pressure, plays a crucial role in optimizing chemical engineering processes, demanding precise predictive models. This research utilizes a Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) framework, enhanced by four advanced optimization techniques: Batch Bayesian Optimization (BBO), Evolution Strategies (ES), Bayesian Probability Improvement (BPI), and Gaussian Processes Optimization (GPO). The algorithm is developed utilizing a dataset of 160 experimental samples, with 90% designated for training and 10% for testing, employing temperature and pressure as input parameters to estimate MDEA density. To counter overfitting, k-fold cross-validation is implemented throughout training procedure. The effectiveness of every optimization method is evaluated through computational runtime and performance indicators, including R-squared (R²), mean squared error (MSE), and average absolute relative error (AARE%). Correlation analysis indicates a significant negative relationship between temperature and MDEA density (correlation coefficient: -0.71), while pressure shows a moderate positive association (0.56). Among the optimization strategies, GBDT-BBO yields the highest precision, with an R² of 0.996223 for the training set and 0.982056 for the test set, outperforming other methods. In terms of computational efficiency, GPO proves the fastest, requiring 147.9 seconds, while BBO is the slowest at 199.5 seconds. Sensitivity analysis highlights the effect of every input variable on MDEA density, demonstrating the robustness of data-driven approaches in tackling complex systems. These models provide dependable tools for predicting MDEA density, minimizing requirement for expensive, time-intensive, and labor-heavy experimental methods.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjac.2025.100637
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrids models to predict density of methyl diethanolamine

Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Hybrids models to predict density of methyl diethanolamine

article en

Abstract

• Introducing hybrid models for estimating density of Methyl Diethanolamine • Outlier detection using Leverage outlier detection algorithm • Sensitivity analysis using relevancy factor The density of Methyl Diethanolamine (MDEA), governed by temperature and pressure, plays a crucial role in optimizing chemical engineering processes, demanding precise predictive models. This research utilizes a Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) framework, enhanced by four advanced optimization techniques: Batch Bayesian Optimization (BBO), Evolution Strategies (ES), Bayesian Probability Improvement (BPI), and Gaussian Processes Optimization (GPO). The algorithm is developed utilizing a dataset of 160 experimental samples, with 90% designated for training and 10% for testing, employing temperature and pressure as input parameters to estimate MDEA density. To counter overfitting, k-fold cross-validation is implemented throughout training procedure. The effectiveness of every optimization method is evaluated through computational runtime and performance indicators, including R-squared (R²), mean squared error (MSE), and average absolute relative error (AARE%). Correlation analysis indicates a significant negative relationship between temperature and MDEA density (correlation coefficient: -0.71), while pressure shows a moderate positive association (0.56). Among the optimization strategies, GBDT-BBO yields the highest precision, with an R² of 0.996223 for the training set and 0.982056 for the test set, outperforming other methods. In terms of computational efficiency, GPO proves the fastest, requiring 147.9 seconds, while BBO is the slowest at 199.5 seconds. Sensitivity analysis highlights the effect of every input variable on MDEA density, demonstrating the robustness of data-driven approaches in tackling complex systems. These models provide dependable tools for predicting MDEA density, minimizing requirement for expensive, time-intensive, and labor-heavy experimental methods.

Chinese Journal of Analytical ChemistryVol. 54(2)
Al-Ahliyya Amman University (JO), Jain University (IN), University of Babylon (IQ), Siksha O Anusandhan University (IN), Hankou University (CN), Balkh University (AF), Iraqi University (IQ), Uttaranchal University (IN), Marwadi University (IN), Institute of Medical Sciences and Sum Hospital (IN), National Pedagogical University of Uzbekistan named after Nizami (UZ), University of Tabuk (SA), Chitkara University (IN), GLA University (IN), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.