“Not Safe for Google”: negociando políticas de abertura a partir das lógicas tecnoeconômicas das plataformas infraestruturais

This article explores how the operational and techno-economic logics of infrastructural platforms have an impact on the openness policies (TKACZ, 2015) of projects that, although they claim to be self-governing, depend on advertising income. We present a case study of the multifandom wiki TV Tropes, with an emphasis on its historical tensions with Google between 2010 and 2024. By analyzing the process of reorganization of the wiki's policies, we observe the creation of categories such as "Safe for Google" and "Not Safe for Google" and the internal discussions about transparency, morality and gender issues. The work reveals the complexity of balancing the policies of infrastructural platforms, commercial demands and the ideals of openness that drive collaborative fan projects.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Contracampo
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22409/tgs20y29
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Not Safe for Google”: negociando políticas de abertura a partir das lógicas tecnoeconômicas das plataformas infraestruturais

Revista Contracampo
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
article

“Not Safe for Google”: negociando políticas de abertura a partir das lógicas tecnoeconômicas das plataformas infraestruturais

article en

Abstract

This article explores how the operational and techno-economic logics of infrastructural platforms have an impact on the openness policies (TKACZ, 2015) of projects that, although they claim to be self-governing, depend on advertising income. We present a case study of the multifandom wiki TV Tropes, with an emphasis on its historical tensions with Google between 2010 and 2024. By analyzing the process of reorganization of the wiki's policies, we observe the creation of categories such as "Safe for Google" and "Not Safe for Google" and the internal discussions about transparency, morality and gender issues. The work reveals the complexity of balancing the policies of infrastructural platforms, commercial demands and the ideals of openness that drive collaborative fan projects.

Revista ContracampoVol. 44(2)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.