Multimodal Machine Learning-Based Technical Failure Prediction in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Background Technical failure is not uncommon and is associated with unfavorable outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR. However, predicting procedural failure remains challenging due to the complex interplay of clinical, anatomical, and procedural factors.Objectives The objective of the study was to develop and validate a data-driven prediction model for technical failure of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), using multimodal information and machine learning algorithms.Methods In a prospective TAVR registry, 184 parameters derived from clinical examination, laboratory studies, electrocardiography, echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, computed tomography, and procedural measurements were used for machine learning modeling of TAVR technical failure prediction. For the machine learning algorithm, 24 different model combinations were developed using a standardized machine learning pipeline. All model development steps were performed solely on the training set, whereas the holdout test set was kept separate for final evaluation. Technical success/failure was defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 definition, which differentiates between vascular and cardiac complications.Results Among 2,937 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR, the rate of cardiac and vascular technical failure was 2.4% and 7.0%, respectively. For both categories of technical failure, the best-performing model demonstrated moderate-to-high discrimination (cardiac: area under the curve: 0.769; vascular: area under the curve: 0.788), with high negative predictive values (0.995 and 0.976, respectively). Interpretability analysis showed that atherosclerotic comorbidities, computed tomography-based aortic root and iliofemoral anatomies, antithrombotic management, and procedural features were consistently identified as key determinants of VARC-3 technical failure across all models.Conclusions Machine learning-based models that integrate multimodal data can effectively predict VARC-3 technical failure in TAVR, refining patient selection and optimizing procedural strategies.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/91482
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Water, and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multimodal Machine Learning-Based Technical Failure Prediction in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Agriculture, Water, and Health
article

Multimodal Machine Learning-Based Technical Failure Prediction in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

article en

Abstract

Background Technical failure is not uncommon and is associated with unfavorable outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR. However, predicting procedural failure remains challenging due to the complex interplay of clinical, anatomical, and procedural factors.Objectives The objective of the study was to develop and validate a data-driven prediction model for technical failure of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), using multimodal information and machine learning algorithms.Methods In a prospective TAVR registry, 184 parameters derived from clinical examination, laboratory studies, electrocardiography, echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, computed tomography, and procedural measurements were used for machine learning modeling of TAVR technical failure prediction. For the machine learning algorithm, 24 different model combinations were developed using a standardized machine learning pipeline. All model development steps were performed solely on the training set, whereas the holdout test set was kept separate for final evaluation. Technical success/failure was defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 definition, which differentiates between vascular and cardiac complications.Results Among 2,937 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR, the rate of cardiac and vascular technical failure was 2.4% and 7.0%, respectively. For both categories of technical failure, the best-performing model demonstrated moderate-to-high discrimination (cardiac: area under the curve: 0.769; vascular: area under the curve: 0.788), with high negative predictive values (0.995 and 0.976, respectively). Interpretability analysis showed that atherosclerotic comorbidities, computed tomography-based aortic root and iliofemoral anatomies, antithrombotic management, and procedural features were consistently identified as key determinants of VARC-3 technical failure across all models.Conclusions Machine learning-based models that integrate multimodal data can effectively predict VARC-3 technical failure in TAVR, refining patient selection and optimizing procedural strategies.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
United Heart and Vascular Clinic (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Agriculture, Water, and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.