Application of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Entrepreneurial Venture Evaluation

This study investigates vendor selection criteria within the framework of supply chain management using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP). To ensure reliability, expert insights were obtained from two industry professionals, each with over 30 years of experience. Six key criteria were evaluated: Quality (C1), Cost and Value (C2), Delivery and Logistics (C3), Customer Service and Support (C4), Security and Risk Management (C5), and Technical Expertise and Capabilities (C6). The FAHP approach was applied to determine the relative importance of these factors. The analysis showed that Cost and Value (C2) emerged as the most critical consideration, while Quality (C1) ranked lowest in priority. These results offer valuable guidance for organizations, highlighting the need to prioritize cost efficiency and value creation when formulating vendor selection strategies

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2025.74274
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Entrepreneurial Venture Evaluation

International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Application of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Entrepreneurial Venture Evaluation

article en

Abstract

This study investigates vendor selection criteria within the framework of supply chain management using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP). To ensure reliability, expert insights were obtained from two industry professionals, each with over 30 years of experience. Six key criteria were evaluated: Quality (C1), Cost and Value (C2), Delivery and Logistics (C3), Customer Service and Support (C4), Security and Risk Management (C5), and Technical Expertise and Capabilities (C6). The FAHP approach was applied to determine the relative importance of these factors. The analysis showed that Cost and Value (C2) emerged as the most critical consideration, while Quality (C1) ranked lowest in priority. These results offer valuable guidance for organizations, highlighting the need to prioritize cost efficiency and value creation when formulating vendor selection strategies

International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering TechnologyVol. 13(9)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.