Comparison among degrees or individuals?: A view from Japanese 'ichiban' superlatives

Two distinct denotations have been proposed for the superlative morpheme -est in the literature, differing in whether comparison is made among degree sets (2-place -est) or individuals (3-place -est). This paper investigates cross-linguistic evidence for this distinction. We argue that the Japanese superlative morpheme ichiban (literally ‘No.1’) exclusively employs the 3-place -est denotation, which compares individuals rather than degrees. Our empirical focus is on two types of modal superlatives in Japanese, with further implications for the (un)availability of elative superlatives and the negation of existence usage in this language.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2024.v29.1294
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison among degrees or individuals?: A view from Japanese 'ichiban' superlatives

Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Comparison among degrees or individuals?: A view from Japanese 'ichiban' superlatives

article en

Abstract

Two distinct denotations have been proposed for the superlative morpheme -est in the literature, differing in whether comparison is made among degree sets (2-place -est) or individuals (3-place -est). This paper investigates cross-linguistic evidence for this distinction. We argue that the Japanese superlative morpheme ichiban (literally ‘No.1’) exclusively employs the 3-place -est denotation, which compares individuals rather than degrees. Our empirical focus is on two types of modal superlatives in Japanese, with further implications for the (un)availability of elative superlatives and the negation of existence usage in this language.

Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison among degrees or individuals?: A view from Japanese 'ichiban' superlatives · Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS