Multiple testing in generalized universal inference

Compared to p-values, e-values provably guarantee safe, valid inference. Applications often require consideration of multiple hypotheses simultaneously, and tools for handling such cases using e-values can be found in the relevant literature. Standard e-value constructions, however, require distributional assumptions that may not be justifiable. This short paper demonstrates that, depending on the multiple testing context, the generalized universal inference framework is well-suited for use with the existing e-value merging and adjustment strategies to control frequentist error rates in multiple testing when the quantities of interest are minimizers of risk functions, thereby avoiding the need for certain distributional assumptions. We demonstrate the strong performance of this general approach in a simulation study involving significance testing in quantile regression.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics & Probability Letters
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2025.110559
Primary Topic
Education, Psychology, and Social Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiple testing in generalized universal inference

Statistics & Probability Letters
Education, Psychology, and Social Research
article

Multiple testing in generalized universal inference

article en

Abstract

Compared to p-values, e-values provably guarantee safe, valid inference. Applications often require consideration of multiple hypotheses simultaneously, and tools for handling such cases using e-values can be found in the relevant literature. Standard e-value constructions, however, require distributional assumptions that may not be justifiable. This short paper demonstrates that, depending on the multiple testing context, the generalized universal inference framework is well-suited for use with the existing e-value merging and adjustment strategies to control frequentist error rates in multiple testing when the quantities of interest are minimizers of risk functions, thereby avoiding the need for certain distributional assumptions. We demonstrate the strong performance of this general approach in a simulation study involving significance testing in quantile regression.

Statistics & Probability LettersVol. 228
North Carolina State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Education, Psychology, and Social Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.