Why 'regret' and 'realize' can embed false beliefs

Verbs of emotion (e.g., regret) and discovery (e.g., realize) presuppose factivity, but they can felicitously follow false-belief statements that suspend their factivity (Klein, 1975; Gazdar, 1979), in contrast to know. This paper addresses this puzzle by proposing a believe-based account with two ingredients: (i) a lexical semantics of regret and realize that contains a backgrounding operator turning at-issue meanings into presuppositions, and (ii) a theory of presupposition projection in attitude contexts (Karttunen, 1974; Heim, 1992; Sudo, 2014). The factivity of regret and realize is derived as a context-sensitive pragmatic implicature, while the factivity of know is a lexical presupposition that holds across contexts.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2024.v29.1311
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why 'regret' and 'realize' can embed false beliefs

Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
article

Why 'regret' and 'realize' can embed false beliefs

article en

Abstract

Verbs of emotion (e.g., regret) and discovery (e.g., realize) presuppose factivity, but they can felicitously follow false-belief statements that suspend their factivity (Klein, 1975; Gazdar, 1979), in contrast to know. This paper addresses this puzzle by proposing a believe-based account with two ingredients: (i) a lexical semantics of regret and realize that contains a backgrounding operator turning at-issue meanings into presuppositions, and (ii) a theory of presupposition projection in attitude contexts (Karttunen, 1974; Heim, 1992; Sudo, 2014). The factivity of regret and realize is derived as a context-sensitive pragmatic implicature, while the factivity of know is a lexical presupposition that holds across contexts.

Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why 'regret' and 'realize' can embed false beliefs · Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS