Psychological Factors in Agent-Based Epidemic Models: how Behavior Shapes Disease Outcomes

In addition to the use of real-world behavioral data, pandemic research profits from behavioral modeling in simulations. In this research, an agent-based model (ABM) was applied to examine the spread of infections under two behavioral assumptions. The modeling approach was implemented using the German Epidemic Modeling System (GEMS) in Julia. The MPICE model, which accounts for individual perceptions and social influences on adherence to self-isolation measures, was applied to a 120-day simulation, in which we examined the spread of a communicable infectious disease within a population (N = 10,000). A Two-Sample t-test revealed a significantly higher disease spread for modeled behavior than for random behavior. This showed that unlike the random behavior model, where preventive actions are implemented probabilistically and uniformly, the psychological model likely introduced delays and inconsistencies in adherence due to variability in individual perceptions and social influences. Sensitivity analysis further showed the relevance of the model‘s components.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infinite Science GmbH
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18416/scp.2025.2051
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological Factors in Agent-Based Epidemic Models: how Behavior Shapes Disease Outcomes

Infinite Science GmbH
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Psychological Factors in Agent-Based Epidemic Models: how Behavior Shapes Disease Outcomes

article en

Abstract

In addition to the use of real-world behavioral data, pandemic research profits from behavioral modeling in simulations. In this research, an agent-based model (ABM) was applied to examine the spread of infections under two behavioral assumptions. The modeling approach was implemented using the German Epidemic Modeling System (GEMS) in Julia. The MPICE model, which accounts for individual perceptions and social influences on adherence to self-isolation measures, was applied to a 120-day simulation, in which we examined the spread of a communicable infectious disease within a population (N = 10,000). A Two-Sample t-test revealed a significantly higher disease spread for modeled behavior than for random behavior. This showed that unlike the random behavior model, where preventive actions are implemented probabilistically and uniformly, the psychological model likely introduced delays and inconsistencies in adherence due to variability in individual perceptions and social influences. Sensitivity analysis further showed the relevance of the model‘s components.

Infinite Science GmbH
University of Lübeck (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Psychological Factors in Agent-Based Epidemic Models: how Behavior Shapes Disease Outcomes · Infinite Science GmbH (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS