Historiography of Science in the Focus of the Theory of Social Relays

M.A. Rozov’s theory of social relays is one of the most original concepts of Rus­sian epistemology and philosophy of science. Its main provisions directly deter­mined the consideration of a wide range of methodological problems of socio-humanitarian knowledge, including understanding the specifics of research in the field of history of science. The author shows that the traditional view of the development of science is teleological. It is believed that scientists are ap­proaching the truth step by step, although they never fully achieve it. Reality is the ultimate goal of scientific research, and in this sense, scientific development is objectively predetermined. The article argues that this is a stereotype of scien­tific reflection that should not be rejected, but analyzed by means of epistemo­logy. Analysis of the reflection of scientists leads to unexpected and paradoxical conclusions. Any action can remain invariant, but its goal setting is interpreted differently. In the theory of social relays, these non-coinciding descriptions of the goals and objectives of materially invariant action are called “reflexive transformations”. The power of knowledge lies in the fact that it speaks on be­half of reality, but this is just a reflexive transformation of activity. It is impossi­ble to convincingly answer the question of how reality “in itself” can correspond to knowledge. The correspondence theory of truth avoids accusations of incon­sistency if it postulates the practical nature of knowledge and in this perspective considers the ontologization procedure. According to the theory of social relays, the fundamental goal of scientific knowledge is the ontological proof of the suc­cess of human activity.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Voprosy filosofii
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2025-6-68-73
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Historiography of Science in the Focus of the Theory of Social Relays

Voprosy filosofii
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Historiography of Science in the Focus of the Theory of Social Relays

article en

Abstract

M.A. Rozov’s theory of social relays is one of the most original concepts of Rus­sian epistemology and philosophy of science. Its main provisions directly deter­mined the consideration of a wide range of methodological problems of socio-humanitarian knowledge, including understanding the specifics of research in the field of history of science. The author shows that the traditional view of the development of science is teleological. It is believed that scientists are ap­proaching the truth step by step, although they never fully achieve it. Reality is the ultimate goal of scientific research, and in this sense, scientific development is objectively predetermined. The article argues that this is a stereotype of scien­tific reflection that should not be rejected, but analyzed by means of epistemo­logy. Analysis of the reflection of scientists leads to unexpected and paradoxical conclusions. Any action can remain invariant, but its goal setting is interpreted differently. In the theory of social relays, these non-coinciding descriptions of the goals and objectives of materially invariant action are called “reflexive transformations”. The power of knowledge lies in the fact that it speaks on be­half of reality, but this is just a reflexive transformation of activity. It is impossi­ble to convincingly answer the question of how reality “in itself” can correspond to knowledge. The correspondence theory of truth avoids accusations of incon­sistency if it postulates the practical nature of knowledge and in this perspective considers the ontologization procedure. According to the theory of social relays, the fundamental goal of scientific knowledge is the ontological proof of the suc­cess of human activity.

Voprosy filosofii(6)
S.I. Vavilov Institute for the History of Science and Technology (RU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.