The Sudanese Identity in the Mirror of Colonial and Post-Independence History

After independence, Sudan’s political elite adopted colonial-inspired policies that sought to divide the country into North and South (Arabs versus Africans). This policy was further reinforced by the civil wars and by the failures of the Sudanese political elite to construct a cohesive national identity. In the post-independence period, one elite group aligned itself with an Arab identity, while another embraced an African identity. Logically, therefore, both identities—Islamic-Arab and African—encompass the majority of the population. Yet, while Islamists and Africanists each claimed to represent this majority, neither addressed the contradictions inherent in their positions. As the tension between the Islamic-Arab and African projects illustrates, there is no permanent Sudanese majority that can be established. Rather, Sudanese people possess multiple and overlapping affiliations—religious, linguistic, and regional—that together produce shifting cross-cutting majorities.

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œjournal of social encounters.
Published
2025-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69755/2995-2212.1377
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Sudanese Identity in the Mirror of Colonial and Post-Independence History

˜The œjournal of social encounters.
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

The Sudanese Identity in the Mirror of Colonial and Post-Independence History

article en

Abstract

After independence, Sudan’s political elite adopted colonial-inspired policies that sought to divide the country into North and South (Arabs versus Africans). This policy was further reinforced by the civil wars and by the failures of the Sudanese political elite to construct a cohesive national identity. In the post-independence period, one elite group aligned itself with an Arab identity, while another embraced an African identity. Logically, therefore, both identities—Islamic-Arab and African—encompass the majority of the population. Yet, while Islamists and Africanists each claimed to represent this majority, neither addressed the contradictions inherent in their positions. As the tension between the Islamic-Arab and African projects illustrates, there is no permanent Sudanese majority that can be established. Rather, Sudanese people possess multiple and overlapping affiliations—religious, linguistic, and regional—that together produce shifting cross-cutting majorities.

˜The œjournal of social encounters.Vol. 9(2)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.