Market Maker or Informed Trader: Who Drive the Relationship Between Option Trading and Underlying Returns? Evidence From Shanghai Stock Exchange 50 ETF Options

ABSTRACT Using option order imbalance as a proxy for market makers' inventory pressure, we identify a distinct return reversal pattern between option trading activity and underlying asset returns. Specifically, call (put) order imbalances are contemporaneously positively (negatively) associated with underlying returns, followed by rapid reversals in the subsequent period. This reversal stems primarily from temporary price pressures caused by market makers' delta‐hedging activities and remains robust after controlling for multiple factors and across various option classifications. Two empirical scenarios reinforce that option order imbalance reflects market makers' inventory risks rather than informed trading. Additional analyses—including event studies, out‐of‐sample tests, examinations of dynamic hedging behavior, and panel regressions with expanded SSE‐listed exchange traded fund option data—further substantiate these findings. Overall, our results emphasize the critical role of market makers as a noninformational trading channel, significantly shaping the relationship between option trading and underlying asset prices.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Futures Markets
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.70038
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Market Maker or Informed Trader: Who Drive the Relationship Between Option Trading and Underlying Returns? Evidence From Shanghai Stock Exchange 50 ETF Options

Journal of Futures Markets
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Market Maker or Informed Trader: Who Drive the Relationship Between Option Trading and Underlying Returns? Evidence From Shanghai Stock Exchange 50 ETF Options

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Using option order imbalance as a proxy for market makers' inventory pressure, we identify a distinct return reversal pattern between option trading activity and underlying asset returns. Specifically, call (put) order imbalances are contemporaneously positively (negatively) associated with underlying returns, followed by rapid reversals in the subsequent period. This reversal stems primarily from temporary price pressures caused by market makers' delta‐hedging activities and remains robust after controlling for multiple factors and across various option classifications. Two empirical scenarios reinforce that option order imbalance reflects market makers' inventory risks rather than informed trading. Additional analyses—including event studies, out‐of‐sample tests, examinations of dynamic hedging behavior, and panel regressions with expanded SSE‐listed exchange traded fund option data—further substantiate these findings. Overall, our results emphasize the critical role of market makers as a noninformational trading channel, significantly shaping the relationship between option trading and underlying asset prices.

Journal of Futures MarketsVol. 45(12)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Shenzhen University (CN), Xiamen University (CN), Hainan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Market Maker or Informed Trader: Who Drive the Relationship Between Option Trading and Underlying Returns? Evidence From Shanghai Stock Exchange 50 ETF Options · Journal of Futures Markets (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS