Mixed-polarity pluralities: A solution to van Benthem’s problem

In this paper, I suggest a new way of resolving a number of problems with an orthodox treatment of modified numerals as existential quantifiers over pluralities. It’s well known that existential quantification renders upper bounds inert—an issue known as ‘van Benthem’s problem’. This can be addressed by building a notion of maximality into the semantics of modified numerals, but this fails to capture attested cumulative readings due to how maximality takes scope with respect to other operators. Existing work addressing this compositional stalemate exploits powerful mechanisms for side-stepping scopal interactions, such as post-suppositions (e.g., Brasoveanu 2013). Here, I maintain a simple treatment of modified numerals as existential quantifiers over pluralities, while significantly enriching the ontology of pluralities themselves. Concretely, I explore the idea that pluralities can encode both positive and negative information, building on recent work by Bledin (2024).

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2025.v29.1222
Primary Topic
Gene expression and cancer classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mixed-polarity pluralities: A solution to van Benthem’s problem

Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Gene expression and cancer classification
article

Mixed-polarity pluralities: A solution to van Benthem’s problem

article en

Abstract

In this paper, I suggest a new way of resolving a number of problems with an orthodox treatment of modified numerals as existential quantifiers over pluralities. It’s well known that existential quantification renders upper bounds inert—an issue known as ‘van Benthem’s problem’. This can be addressed by building a notion of maximality into the semantics of modified numerals, but this fails to capture attested cumulative readings due to how maximality takes scope with respect to other operators. Existing work addressing this compositional stalemate exploits powerful mechanisms for side-stepping scopal interactions, such as post-suppositions (e.g., Brasoveanu 2013). Here, I maintain a simple treatment of modified numerals as existential quantifiers over pluralities, while significantly enriching the ontology of pluralities themselves. Concretely, I explore the idea that pluralities can encode both positive and negative information, building on recent work by Bledin (2024).

Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Gene expression and cancer classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.