Comparative analysis of deep learning models for chest X-ray image classification

This study examines the efficacy of deep learning models in classifying chest X-ray images, particularly enhancing diagnostic precision for thoracic conditions. The aim is to evaluate and compare the performance of several advanced deep learning architectures—ResNet50, DenseNet121, Efficient Net, and Mobile Net—leveraging the NIH Chest X-ray dataset. The methodology employs a rigorous evaluation framework using metrics including precision, recall, F1-score, and accuracy, along- side interpretability methods such as Grad-CAM to elucidate decision-making processes in model predictions. The primary contribution of this work lies in determining the optimal model for clinical deployment and offering approaches to tackle issues like computational demands and dataset imbalances. By addressing these challenges, the research advances toward integrating artificial intelligence into medical workflows, contributing to the progression of AI-enhanced diagnostics to address global healthcare disparities and improve patient care outcomes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17173695
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of deep learning models for chest X-ray image classification

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Comparative analysis of deep learning models for chest X-ray image classification

article en

Abstract

This study examines the efficacy of deep learning models in classifying chest X-ray images, particularly enhancing diagnostic precision for thoracic conditions. The aim is to evaluate and compare the performance of several advanced deep learning architectures—ResNet50, DenseNet121, Efficient Net, and Mobile Net—leveraging the NIH Chest X-ray dataset. The methodology employs a rigorous evaluation framework using metrics including precision, recall, F1-score, and accuracy, along- side interpretability methods such as Grad-CAM to elucidate decision-making processes in model predictions. The primary contribution of this work lies in determining the optimal model for clinical deployment and offering approaches to tackle issues like computational demands and dataset imbalances. By addressing these challenges, the research advances toward integrating artificial intelligence into medical workflows, contributing to the progression of AI-enhanced diagnostics to address global healthcare disparities and improve patient care outcomes.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Savitribai Phule Pune University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.