Decision Support System for Determining Subsidized Food Receipt for Poor Families with SAW Method

In accordance with the regulations set by the Office of Kotasan Village, residents are entitled to receive subsidized food based on specific criteria. To determine who is selected to receive subsidized food and distribute it to low-income families will be conducted by the Kotasan Village Office. As a supporting tool to determine individuals eligible to receive subsidized food, a decision support system is required. Within the decision support system, there are several methods, one of which can be used is the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method. In this study, the author will address a case to find the best alternative from certain established criteria by comparing the alternatives using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method. In this evaluation, the alternative Saidi ranks first with a Vi value of 0.910, followed by Zum in second place with a Vi of 0.820. In third position, Arju has a Vi value of 0.761. Meanwhile, the alternative with the lowest rank is Sri with a Vi of 0.425, followed by Supri with a Vi of 0.433 and Paiman with a Vi of 0.461.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Informatics and Data Science
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64366/ijids.v2i1.24
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision Support System for Determining Subsidized Food Receipt for Poor Families with SAW Method

International Journal of Informatics and Data Science
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Decision Support System for Determining Subsidized Food Receipt for Poor Families with SAW Method

article en

Abstract

In accordance with the regulations set by the Office of Kotasan Village, residents are entitled to receive subsidized food based on specific criteria. To determine who is selected to receive subsidized food and distribute it to low-income families will be conducted by the Kotasan Village Office. As a supporting tool to determine individuals eligible to receive subsidized food, a decision support system is required. Within the decision support system, there are several methods, one of which can be used is the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method. In this study, the author will address a case to find the best alternative from certain established criteria by comparing the alternatives using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method. In this evaluation, the alternative Saidi ranks first with a Vi value of 0.910, followed by Zum in second place with a Vi of 0.820. In third position, Arju has a Vi value of 0.761. Meanwhile, the alternative with the lowest rank is Sri with a Vi of 0.425, followed by Supri with a Vi of 0.433 and Paiman with a Vi of 0.461.

International Journal of Informatics and Data ScienceVol. 2(1)
Universitas Bina Darma (ID)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.