Optimization of Different Metal Casting Processes Using Three Simple and Efficient Advanced Algorithms

This paper presents three simple and efficient advanced optimization algorithms, namely the best–worst–random (BWR), best–mean–random (BMR), and best–mean–worst–random (BMWR) algorithms designed to address unconstrained and constrained single- and multi-objective optimization tasks of the metal casting processes. The effectiveness of the algorithms is demonstrated through real case studies, including (i) optimization of a lost foam casting process for producing a fifth wheel coupling shell from EN-GJS-400-18 ductile iron, (ii) optimization of process parameters of die casting of A360 Al-alloy, (iii) optimization of wear rate in AA7178 alloy reinforced with nano-SiC particles fabricated via the stir-casting process, (iv) two-objectives optimization of a low-pressure casting process using a sand mold for producing A356 engine block, and (v) four-objectives optimization of a squeeze casting process for LM20 material. Results demonstrate that the proposed algorithms consistently achieve faster convergence, superior solution quality, and reduced function evaluations compared to simulation software (ProCAST, CAE, and FEA) and established metaheuristics (ABC, Rao-1, PSO, NSGA-II, and GA). For single-objective problems, BWR, BMR, and BMWR yield nearly identical solutions, whereas in multi-objective tasks, their behaviors diverge, offering well-distributed Pareto fronts and improved convergence. These findings establish BWR, BMR, and BMWR as efficient and robust optimizers, positioning them as promising decision support tools for industrial metal casting.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metals
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/met15091057
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of Different Metal Casting Processes Using Three Simple and Efficient Advanced Algorithms

4 citations
Metals
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
9.92
article

Optimization of Different Metal Casting Processes Using Three Simple and Efficient Advanced Algorithms

article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper presents three simple and efficient advanced optimization algorithms, namely the best–worst–random (BWR), best–mean–random (BMR), and best–mean–worst–random (BMWR) algorithms designed to address unconstrained and constrained single- and multi-objective optimization tasks of the metal casting processes. The effectiveness of the algorithms is demonstrated through real case studies, including (i) optimization of a lost foam casting process for producing a fifth wheel coupling shell from EN-GJS-400-18 ductile iron, (ii) optimization of process parameters of die casting of A360 Al-alloy, (iii) optimization of wear rate in AA7178 alloy reinforced with nano-SiC particles fabricated via the stir-casting process, (iv) two-objectives optimization of a low-pressure casting process using a sand mold for producing A356 engine block, and (v) four-objectives optimization of a squeeze casting process for LM20 material. Results demonstrate that the proposed algorithms consistently achieve faster convergence, superior solution quality, and reduced function evaluations compared to simulation software (ProCAST, CAE, and FEA) and established metaheuristics (ABC, Rao-1, PSO, NSGA-II, and GA). For single-objective problems, BWR, BMR, and BMWR yield nearly identical solutions, whereas in multi-objective tasks, their behaviors diverge, offering well-distributed Pareto fronts and improved convergence. These findings establish BWR, BMR, and BMWR as efficient and robust optimizers, positioning them as promising decision support tools for industrial metal casting.

MetalsVol. 15(9)
Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology Surat (IN), University of Aveiro (PT)
National Research Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.