High-altitude Martian plume is likely an ordinary twilight cloud

Sánchez-Lavega et al. (2015) analyzed ground-based and space-based images of Mars that they interpreted as showing two high-altitude plumes. Their derived plume altitudes of 200 to 250 km or higher defied atmospheric processes known at the time. No supporting observations have been published in the decade since, despite ample observations by the fleet of spacecraft currently orbiting the planet. Instead more recent observations provide strong constraints against the interpretations proposed at the time. We therefore reanalyzed the images used in that work and reviewed the methods employed by Sánchez-Lavega et al. (2015). We have identified several issues in the original data processing that may have affected the altitude determination, including surface-feature registration, black-level selection, color-image alignment, inconsistent map gridding, unknown image preprocessing, and the propagation of systematic uncertainties. Our independent analysis indicates that the features in these images are consistent with post-terminator clouds with altitudes between 50 and 100 km. Such clouds are relatively common at Mars and require no new atmospheric physics or chemistry to understand.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Icarus
Published
2025-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2025.116823
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-altitude Martian plume is likely an ordinary twilight cloud

Icarus
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

High-altitude Martian plume is likely an ordinary twilight cloud

article en

Abstract

Sánchez-Lavega et al. (2015) analyzed ground-based and space-based images of Mars that they interpreted as showing two high-altitude plumes. Their derived plume altitudes of 200 to 250 km or higher defied atmospheric processes known at the time. No supporting observations have been published in the decade since, despite ample observations by the fleet of spacecraft currently orbiting the planet. Instead more recent observations provide strong constraints against the interpretations proposed at the time. We therefore reanalyzed the images used in that work and reviewed the methods employed by Sánchez-Lavega et al. (2015). We have identified several issues in the original data processing that may have affected the altitude determination, including surface-feature registration, black-level selection, color-image alignment, inconsistent map gridding, unknown image preprocessing, and the propagation of systematic uncertainties. Our independent analysis indicates that the features in these images are consistent with post-terminator clouds with altitudes between 50 and 100 km. Such clouds are relatively common at Mars and require no new atmospheric physics or chemistry to understand.

IcarusVol. 444
University of California, Riverside (US), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), University of Basilicata (IT), Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (US), California State University, San Bernardino (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.