Existing challenges in ethical AI: Addressing algorithmic bias, transparency, accountability and regulatory compliance

Artificial Intelligence has transformed industries in terms of efficiency, decision-making, and personalization across healthcare, finance, and education. This rapid integration of AI into daily life has also brought forth significant ethical challenges regarding algorithmic bias, transparency, accountability, and regulatory compliance. These come with risks to the equitable application of AI, leading to outcomes that can perpetuate discrimination and systemic injustices. Examples include biased algorithms leading to disparate hiring practices, healthcare access inequity, and credit distribution differences. Most instances of ethical gaps in the use of AI go unmonitored due to a need for well-defined mechanisms for responsibility. Besides that, regulation at a pace equal to AI innovation is a great challenge that creates gaps in oversight and increases risks to privacy, fairness, and other elements of well-being in society. The paper explores these challenges, discussing the causality of the challenges and suggesting practical ways of mitigating them. It converses technical developments in fairness-aware algorithms, explainable AI, and the legal framework of GDPR to make a case for a multi-stakeholder comprehensive approach towards ethical AI. It would call for collaboration among policymakers, technologists, and industry leaders to build public confidence, ensure fairness and align AI progress with societal values. In the final analysis, the findings have underlined the urgent need for ethical foresight to tap into the potential of AI responsibly and equitably.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17164754
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Existing challenges in ethical AI: Addressing algorithmic bias, transparency, accountability and regulatory compliance

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Existing challenges in ethical AI: Addressing algorithmic bias, transparency, accountability and regulatory compliance

article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence has transformed industries in terms of efficiency, decision-making, and personalization across healthcare, finance, and education. This rapid integration of AI into daily life has also brought forth significant ethical challenges regarding algorithmic bias, transparency, accountability, and regulatory compliance. These come with risks to the equitable application of AI, leading to outcomes that can perpetuate discrimination and systemic injustices. Examples include biased algorithms leading to disparate hiring practices, healthcare access inequity, and credit distribution differences. Most instances of ethical gaps in the use of AI go unmonitored due to a need for well-defined mechanisms for responsibility. Besides that, regulation at a pace equal to AI innovation is a great challenge that creates gaps in oversight and increases risks to privacy, fairness, and other elements of well-being in society. The paper explores these challenges, discussing the causality of the challenges and suggesting practical ways of mitigating them. It converses technical developments in fairness-aware algorithms, explainable AI, and the legal framework of GDPR to make a case for a multi-stakeholder comprehensive approach towards ethical AI. It would call for collaboration among policymakers, technologists, and industry leaders to build public confidence, ensure fairness and align AI progress with societal values. In the final analysis, the findings have underlined the urgent need for ethical foresight to tap into the potential of AI responsibly and equitably.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Judson University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.