Autopsy of a Doctrine: <i>Loper Bright</i>’s Implications on Inevitable Artificial Intelligence Regulation and Congressional Considerations for an Organic Statute

Because AI is sufficiently unique from other regulated technologies, Congress should ensure that a federal agency regulating AI retains authority to interpret and effectuate its organic statute by incorporating Chevron-like deference into the statute, thus insulating the agency from judicial challenge. Part II of this Case Note introduces fundamental background on the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and the Chevron doctrine, both of which are necessary to contextualize Loper Bright and the present argument. Part III reviews Loper Bright’s majority, dissenting, and concurring opinions, and describes how experts predict the decision will fundamentally change agency statutory interpretation and operations. Part IV discusses the reality of inevitable regulation for AI, summarizes proposals to create an agency overseeing AI, and proposes codifying Chevron deference at the federal level. Part V then concludes that AI is sufficiently unique, such that the efficient and responsible regulation of AI calls for codifying Chevron-like deference in an AI agency’s organic statute.

Publication Details

Journal
Digital USD (University of San Diego)
Published
2025-08-29
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Autopsy of a Doctrine: Loper Bright’s Implications on Inevitable Artificial Intelligence Regulation and Congressional Considerations for an Organic Statute

Digital USD (University of San Diego)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Autopsy of a Doctrine: Loper Bright’s Implications on Inevitable Artificial Intelligence Regulation and Congressional Considerations for an Organic Statute

article en

Abstract

Because AI is sufficiently unique from other regulated technologies, Congress should ensure that a federal agency regulating AI retains authority to interpret and effectuate its organic statute by incorporating Chevron-like deference into the statute, thus insulating the agency from judicial challenge. Part II of this Case Note introduces fundamental background on the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and the Chevron doctrine, both of which are necessary to contextualize Loper Bright and the present argument. Part III reviews Loper Bright’s majority, dissenting, and concurring opinions, and describes how experts predict the decision will fundamentally change agency statutory interpretation and operations. Part IV discusses the reality of inevitable regulation for AI, summarizes proposals to create an agency overseeing AI, and proposes codifying Chevron deference at the federal level. Part V then concludes that AI is sufficiently unique, such that the efficient and responsible regulation of AI calls for codifying Chevron-like deference in an AI agency’s organic statute.

Digital USD (University of San Diego)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Autopsy of a Doctrine: <i>Loper Bright</i>’s Implications on Inevitable Artificial Intelligence Regulation and Congressional Considerations for an Organic Statute · Digital USD (University of San Diego) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS