Adaptive learning, instruction, and teaching in schools: Unraveling context, sources, implementation, and goals in a systematic review

Adaptivity allows for meeting diverse students' needs. Building on the Ada-LIT framework, this review systematically investigates 1) in which contexts, 2) based on which sources and types of assessment, 3) through which operationalizations and types of delivery, and 4) with which targeted outcomes adaptations are made in schools. We identified 69 publications double-screening 555 empirical research articles published between 2018 and 2022. Most research was conducted in elementary schools, particularly in math, and adaptivity was mainly delivered by systems. Performance was the most frequent adaptive source and targeted outcome, with less emphasis on emotions or demographic characteristics. Assessment of the adaptive source relied primarily on trace data. Operationalizations were mainly on a micro-level, specifically adaptive navigation, support, and difficulty progression. Studies typically do not report on all six components of adaptivity as outlined in the framework. The Ada-LIT framework can guide rigorous designs and reporting of studies investigating adaptivity in schools. Educational relevance The Ada-LIT framework integrates six essential components of adaptivity in schools: context, source, assessment, delivery, operationalization, and outcome. The review showed adaptivity is primarily based on performance and implemented to improve performance, delivered mainly by systems, and mostly investigated in math. This highlights underexplored areas, accentuating an agenda for future research that taps into other essential components of adaptive learning, instruction, and teaching (LIT) in schools. The framework can guide consistent and comprehensive reporting of future research, fostering the clarity and comparability of findings and, thus, enhancing a collective understanding, robust evidence generation, and an actionable implementation model of adaptive LIT in schools.

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Individual Differences
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102781
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adaptive learning, instruction, and teaching in schools: Unraveling context, sources, implementation, and goals in a systematic review

4 citations
Learning and Individual Differences
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
9.92
article

Adaptive learning, instruction, and teaching in schools: Unraveling context, sources, implementation, and goals in a systematic review

article en
4 citations

Abstract

Adaptivity allows for meeting diverse students' needs. Building on the Ada-LIT framework, this review systematically investigates 1) in which contexts, 2) based on which sources and types of assessment, 3) through which operationalizations and types of delivery, and 4) with which targeted outcomes adaptations are made in schools. We identified 69 publications double-screening 555 empirical research articles published between 2018 and 2022. Most research was conducted in elementary schools, particularly in math, and adaptivity was mainly delivered by systems. Performance was the most frequent adaptive source and targeted outcome, with less emphasis on emotions or demographic characteristics. Assessment of the adaptive source relied primarily on trace data. Operationalizations were mainly on a micro-level, specifically adaptive navigation, support, and difficulty progression. Studies typically do not report on all six components of adaptivity as outlined in the framework. The Ada-LIT framework can guide rigorous designs and reporting of studies investigating adaptivity in schools. Educational relevance The Ada-LIT framework integrates six essential components of adaptivity in schools: context, source, assessment, delivery, operationalization, and outcome. The review showed adaptivity is primarily based on performance and implemented to improve performance, delivered mainly by systems, and mostly investigated in math. This highlights underexplored areas, accentuating an agenda for future research that taps into other essential components of adaptive learning, instruction, and teaching (LIT) in schools. The framework can guide consistent and comprehensive reporting of future research, fostering the clarity and comparability of findings and, thus, enhancing a collective understanding, robust evidence generation, and an actionable implementation model of adaptive LIT in schools.

Learning and Individual DifferencesVol. 124
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.