Effectiveness and Student Perceptions of Online Research Methodology Intersemester Courses in Engineering

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and student perceptions of online intersemester courses in engineering, specifically the Research Methodology course at a Mexican public university. A mixed-methods approach was applied, combining surveys, statistical analysis, and qualitative feedback. Data were collected from 522 students who took the course in either online or face-to-face modalities over five academic terms (2022–2024). Findings reveal statistically significant differences in academic performance between modalities, with greater variability observed among online students. While participants reported enhanced autonomy, adaptability, and time management in the online format, they also experienced reduced interaction and self-regulation challenges. Students preferred synchronous or blended formats, particularly those with visual and multimodal learning styles. The study concludes that online intersemester courses are viable when effective instructional design and equitable technological access are supported. These insights contribute to improving course planning and institutional policies for intersemester online education.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Instruction
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2025.18439a
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness and Student Perceptions of Online Research Methodology Intersemester Courses in Engineering

International Journal of Instruction
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Effectiveness and Student Perceptions of Online Research Methodology Intersemester Courses in Engineering

article en

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and student perceptions of online intersemester courses in engineering, specifically the Research Methodology course at a Mexican public university. A mixed-methods approach was applied, combining surveys, statistical analysis, and qualitative feedback. Data were collected from 522 students who took the course in either online or face-to-face modalities over five academic terms (2022–2024). Findings reveal statistically significant differences in academic performance between modalities, with greater variability observed among online students. While participants reported enhanced autonomy, adaptability, and time management in the online format, they also experienced reduced interaction and self-regulation challenges. Students preferred synchronous or blended formats, particularly those with visual and multimodal learning styles. The study concludes that online intersemester courses are viable when effective instructional design and equitable technological access are supported. These insights contribute to improving course planning and institutional policies for intersemester online education.

International Journal of InstructionVol. 18(4)
Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (MX)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effectiveness and Student Perceptions of Online Research Methodology Intersemester Courses in Engineering · International Journal of Instruction (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS