Stethorrhagus canis Xavier, Brescovit & Bonaldo, 2025, sp. nov.

Stethorrhagus canis sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 9B0CE66C-3675-4EA9-911D-41E8DA950DC4 Figs 47, 49–50 Diagnosis Females resemble those of S. felis sp. nov. and S. ovis sp. nov. by the CO slit-shaped, disposed posteriorly in relation to SI (Figs 29C–D, 30C–D, 35D–E, 36C–D), differing by the CO large, as wide as the distance between the CO and the posterior margin of the epigynal plate, located on the posterior half of the epigynal plate (Fig. 47C–F) (CO relatively small, as wide as five times the distance between the CO and the posterior margin of the epigynal plate, located on the anterior half of the epigynal plate in both S. felis and S. ovis – Figs 29C–D, 30C–D, 36C–D, 35D–E). Etymology The specific name is a noun in apposition in reference to the carnivor genus Canis Linnaeus, 1758, since the general conformation of the epigynum (as in Fig. 47C) resembles a basset hound head in frontal view. Material examined Holotype ECUADOR • ♀; 6–8 mi. SE of Baños, N slope of Mt Tungurahua; [1°24′59″ S, 78°25′33″ W]; 13 Feb. 1955; E.S. Schlinger and E.S. Ross leg.; CAS9119044. Paratype ECUADOR • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; CAS9119045. Description Female (holotype – CASENT9119044) COLORATION. Cephalothorax brown. Legs red-brown with tibiae, metatarsi and tarsi yellow. Abdomen gray with dorsal anterior border brown (Fig. 47A). Sternum with deep sternal excavations (Fig. 47B). MEASUREMENTS. Total length 6.70. Carapace 2.69 long, 2.07 wide. Clypeus 0.21. Leg measurements: I: femur 2.13/ patella 0.91/ tibia 1.94/ metatarsus 1.76/ tarsus 1.00/ total 7.74; II: 2.03/ 0.92/ 1.77/ 1.61/ 0.96/ 7.29; III: 1.95/ 0.82/ 1.53/ 1.70/ 0.93/ 6.93; IV: 2.43/ 0.99/ 2.26/ 2.58/ 1.05/ 9.31. Eye diameters: AME 0.19, ALE 0.17, PME 0.15, PLE 0.17. Chelicerae 1.19 long, with four promarginal teeth and five retromarginal denticles. LEG SPINATION. I – femur d1-1-0, p0-0-1, r0; tibia d0, p0, r0, v2-2-2; metatarsus d0, p0, r0, v2-2-0. II – femur d1-1-0, p0, r0; tibia d0, p0, r0, v2-2-2; metatarsus d0, p0, r0, v2-2-0. III – femur d1-1-0, p0, r0; tibia d0, p1-1-0, r1-1-0, v1p-2-2; metatarsus d0, p1-1-0, r1-1-0, v2-2-1. IV – femur d1-1-1, p0-1-1, r0; tibia d0, p1-1-0, r1-1-0, v1p-2-2; metatarsus d0, p1-1-0, r1-1-0, v2-2-1. EPIGYNUM. CO slit-shaped, disposed posteriorly in relation to spermathecae, CO large (as wide as the distance between the CO and the posterior margin of the epigynal plate), placed on the posterior half of the epigynal plate, VEP absent, PVP as wide as two times the distance between the anterior and posterior margins, PVP not covering SI, copulatory duct relatively short with large branches pointed anteriorly (Fig. 47C–F). Distribution Known only from the type locality (Fig. 50).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17159836
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stethorrhagus canis Xavier, Brescovit & Bonaldo, 2025, sp. nov.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Stethorrhagus canis Xavier, Brescovit & Bonaldo, 2025, sp. nov.

article en

Abstract

Stethorrhagus canis sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 9B0CE66C-3675-4EA9-911D-41E8DA950DC4 Figs 47, 49–50 Diagnosis Females resemble those of S. felis sp. nov. and S. ovis sp. nov. by the CO slit-shaped, disposed posteriorly in relation to SI (Figs 29C–D, 30C–D, 35D–E, 36C–D), differing by the CO large, as wide as the distance between the CO and the posterior margin of the epigynal plate, located on the posterior half of the epigynal plate (Fig. 47C–F) (CO relatively small, as wide as five times the distance between the CO and the posterior margin of the epigynal plate, located on the anterior half of the epigynal plate in both S. felis and S. ovis – Figs 29C–D, 30C–D, 36C–D, 35D–E). Etymology The specific name is a noun in apposition in reference to the carnivor genus Canis Linnaeus, 1758, since the general conformation of the epigynum (as in Fig. 47C) resembles a basset hound head in frontal view. Material examined Holotype ECUADOR • ♀; 6–8 mi. SE of Baños, N slope of Mt Tungurahua; [1°24′59″ S, 78°25′33″ W]; 13 Feb. 1955; E.S. Schlinger and E.S. Ross leg.; CAS9119044. Paratype ECUADOR • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; CAS9119045. Description Female (holotype – CASENT9119044) COLORATION. Cephalothorax brown. Legs red-brown with tibiae, metatarsi and tarsi yellow. Abdomen gray with dorsal anterior border brown (Fig. 47A). Sternum with deep sternal excavations (Fig. 47B). MEASUREMENTS. Total length 6.70. Carapace 2.69 long, 2.07 wide. Clypeus 0.21. Leg measurements: I: femur 2.13/ patella 0.91/ tibia 1.94/ metatarsus 1.76/ tarsus 1.00/ total 7.74; II: 2.03/ 0.92/ 1.77/ 1.61/ 0.96/ 7.29; III: 1.95/ 0.82/ 1.53/ 1.70/ 0.93/ 6.93; IV: 2.43/ 0.99/ 2.26/ 2.58/ 1.05/ 9.31. Eye diameters: AME 0.19, ALE 0.17, PME 0.15, PLE 0.17. Chelicerae 1.19 long, with four promarginal teeth and five retromarginal denticles. LEG SPINATION. I – femur d1-1-0, p0-0-1, r0; tibia d0, p0, r0, v2-2-2; metatarsus d0, p0, r0, v2-2-0. II – femur d1-1-0, p0, r0; tibia d0, p0, r0, v2-2-2; metatarsus d0, p0, r0, v2-2-0. III – femur d1-1-0, p0, r0; tibia d0, p1-1-0, r1-1-0, v1p-2-2; metatarsus d0, p1-1-0, r1-1-0, v2-2-1. IV – femur d1-1-1, p0-1-1, r0; tibia d0, p1-1-0, r1-1-0, v1p-2-2; metatarsus d0, p1-1-0, r1-1-0, v2-2-1. EPIGYNUM. CO slit-shaped, disposed posteriorly in relation to spermathecae, CO large (as wide as the distance between the CO and the posterior margin of the epigynal plate), placed on the posterior half of the epigynal plate, VEP absent, PVP as wide as two times the distance between the anterior and posterior margins, PVP not covering SI, copulatory duct relatively short with large branches pointed anteriorly (Fig. 47C–F). Distribution Known only from the type locality (Fig. 50).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (BR), Instituto Butantan (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.