Finding legal approaches to dealing with the past after the fall of communism from the perspective of legal theory and comparative law

The paper deals with the question of legal punishment of crimes, in particular crimes against life and freedom, which were committed in the former socialist states of Central and Eastern Europe in the name of the State or at least with its tacit approval. This question is discussed in the paper from the perspectives of legal theory and comparative law. After clarifying the concept of “communist crimes”, which in countries such as Poland is even a legal concept of applicable law, the first part of the paper examines the legal-theoretical and legal-philosophical problems of criminal penalties for massive human rights violations committed under the laws of the socialist era. As legal-theoretical polar opposites in this regard, it presents the position of Gustav Radbruch with his two famous formulae and the position of Hans Kelsen’s legal positivism. It points out that in the case of communist crimes only the first of Radbruch’s two formulae, the “intolerability formula” can be applied. The perspective of comparative law is the subject of the second part of the paper. It shows that the spectrum of criminal-law dealing with the communist past since 1989 ranges from a relatively systematic legal prosecution of at least the most serious human rights violation, for example in the cases of homicides at the former inner German border, to complete non-prosecution by the judiciary of Eastern European states such as Russia, Belarus, Georgia, Bulgaria or Croatia. Where criminal prosecution took place, the question arose not only of the statute of limitations, but also of the nulla poena sine lege principle. This principle, which is based on the rule of law, is not only important with respect to the validity of statutory law during the communist era, but also with regard to the different interpretative practices of courts in the former socialist states.