Cohousing and Formal/Informal Aspects of the Boundary

There is increasing interest in architecture in cohousing as part of the search for solutions to sustainable habitation. In this context, cohousing introduces new forms of urban living to address contemporary challenges and needs. While the need for private homes remains unquestioned, the collective nature of cohousing presents a distinct condition in which the private aspect of housing blends with qualities of public space. This paper explores the collective aspect of shared space in cohousing and its potential to enhance public space, considering both formal and informal qualities. Cohousing has been criticized for providing spaces that encourage interaction solely among residents, fostering introverted complexes that weaken the public realm. After discussing the typologies of cohousing collective space, we draw on Sennett’s analysis of collaboration and Bakhtin’s concepts of polyphony and the carnivalesque to argue for conceiving collective space as an open field of communication between cohousing and public space.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17131678
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cohousing and Formal/Informal Aspects of the Boundary

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Cohousing and Formal/Informal Aspects of the Boundary

article en

Abstract

There is increasing interest in architecture in cohousing as part of the search for solutions to sustainable habitation. In this context, cohousing introduces new forms of urban living to address contemporary challenges and needs. While the need for private homes remains unquestioned, the collective nature of cohousing presents a distinct condition in which the private aspect of housing blends with qualities of public space. This paper explores the collective aspect of shared space in cohousing and its potential to enhance public space, considering both formal and informal qualities. Cohousing has been criticized for providing spaces that encourage interaction solely among residents, fostering introverted complexes that weaken the public realm. After discussing the typologies of cohousing collective space, we draw on Sennett’s analysis of collaboration and Bakhtin’s concepts of polyphony and the carnivalesque to argue for conceiving collective space as an open field of communication between cohousing and public space.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.