A LEXICO-SEMANTIC COMPARISON OF WEIGHT AND MASS UNITS IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH

Measurement units are not only scientific categories but also linguistic and cultural phenomena that embody a society’s historical experience and worldview. This study explores the lexico-semantic features of weight and mass units in Uzbek and English, focusing on both traditional and modern systems of measurement. While the metric system (gram, kilogram, ton) has become internationally standardized, Uzbek retains traces of indigenous units such as misqol and pud, whereas English preserves remnants of the imperial system (pound, stone, ounce). By employing comparative and descriptive methods, the research identifies semantic overlaps, lexical divergences, and cultural-specific connotations associated with these units in each language. The analysis highlights how linguistic representations of measurement units reflect broader cognitive models, metaphorical usage, and socio-economic realities. Furthermore, the paper addresses translation challenges that arise from differences between metric and imperial systems, particularly in scientific, technical, and literary texts. The findings demonstrate that a lexico-semantic comparison of measurement units contributes not only to terminological standardization but also to a deeper understanding of linguistic diversity and intercultural communication between Uzbek and English.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17149592
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A LEXICO-SEMANTIC COMPARISON OF WEIGHT AND MASS UNITS IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

A LEXICO-SEMANTIC COMPARISON OF WEIGHT AND MASS UNITS IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH

article en

Abstract

Measurement units are not only scientific categories but also linguistic and cultural phenomena that embody a society’s historical experience and worldview. This study explores the lexico-semantic features of weight and mass units in Uzbek and English, focusing on both traditional and modern systems of measurement. While the metric system (gram, kilogram, ton) has become internationally standardized, Uzbek retains traces of indigenous units such as misqol and pud, whereas English preserves remnants of the imperial system (pound, stone, ounce). By employing comparative and descriptive methods, the research identifies semantic overlaps, lexical divergences, and cultural-specific connotations associated with these units in each language. The analysis highlights how linguistic representations of measurement units reflect broader cognitive models, metaphorical usage, and socio-economic realities. Furthermore, the paper addresses translation challenges that arise from differences between metric and imperial systems, particularly in scientific, technical, and literary texts. The findings demonstrate that a lexico-semantic comparison of measurement units contributes not only to terminological standardization but also to a deeper understanding of linguistic diversity and intercultural communication between Uzbek and English.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A LEXICO-SEMANTIC COMPARISON OF WEIGHT AND MASS UNITS IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS