Can TCM be supported by Nerve Placements and Anatomical Trains? A Comparative Review of Meridians & Acupoints against Anatomical Trains & Nerve Placements

Objective: To compare Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) with Western Research through: (1) the comparison of Meridians and the Anatomy Trains model; (2) the comparison of Acupoints with nerve locations and functions. Materials & Methods: The Google Scholar database has been used to find papers for this comparison. For data which require most up to date, a filter from 2021 has been applied, no such filter have been applied to papers bringing definitions and functions. The official Anatomy Trains book and the Acupuncture Association of Charted Physiotherapists ‘Let Qi Flow’ book were used for the Meridian and Anatomy Trains comparison. The ‘Acupoint Pocket Reference’ book was used for the acupoints and nerves section. Results: 11 of the 12 meridians inspected were matched with an Anatomy Trains line. 2 of the 12 meridians have research supporting their effect, while the other 10 vary between partial research and no research at all to back their effect. 21 of 22 nerves inspected have been matched with an Acupoint. 12 of the 21 nerves shared a function with their corresponding acupoints, the other 9 do not share a function with the acupoint effect. Conclusion: While there is no clear answer, as both aims have been showing both positive and negative comparison outcomes, we can say in confidence that there are truths within TCM. We have found sources from the western academic world supporting the findings of TCM. While further research is required, TCM, on its different disciplines, can provide help to the public on varying conditions.