The Resonant Geometry Field Model: Mapping the Fluid Dynamics of Emotion, Syntax, and Resonance

We present a minimal field model of communication—resonance geometry—in which 11 core emotions emerge as geometric features of a shared medium rather than as discrete labels. This model extends the Theory of Communication Resonance & Intelligence Tuning (ToCRIT) by translating its qualitative constructs—resonant tethers (connection “wells” between communicators), lucid/drag zones (smooth vs resistant flow of emotion and syntax), and the Cognitive-Emotive Fracture Principle (closeness in syntax or emotion can increase risk of rupture)—into quantifiable field metrics: throughput (𝓣), rigidity (ρ), coupling (k), and hemispheric shear (α). Additional modifiers include a Ranvier–Stokes analogue (continuity punctuated by “node kicks”) and a death-gravity term (𝔇) capturing salience distortions near conversational endings. Pilot studies reveal that shifts in k and α reliably mark authenticity, rupture, and repair—across public speech, acted grief, and cross-species resonance (e.g., whale vocalizations). The model offers falsifiable predictions, lightweight measurement protocols, and cross-domain applications—from conversation UX to human–AI attunement. By linking poetic metaphors (wells, rogue waves) to reproducible metrics, resonance geometry operationalizes a fluid-dynamic layer of resonant communication.

Publication Details

Journal
Clark Digital Commons (Clark University)
Published
2025-09-16
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Resonant Geometry Field Model: Mapping the Fluid Dynamics of Emotion, Syntax, and Resonance

Clark Digital Commons (Clark University)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

The Resonant Geometry Field Model: Mapping the Fluid Dynamics of Emotion, Syntax, and Resonance

article en

Abstract

We present a minimal field model of communication—resonance geometry—in which 11 core emotions emerge as geometric features of a shared medium rather than as discrete labels. This model extends the Theory of Communication Resonance & Intelligence Tuning (ToCRIT) by translating its qualitative constructs—resonant tethers (connection “wells” between communicators), lucid/drag zones (smooth vs resistant flow of emotion and syntax), and the Cognitive-Emotive Fracture Principle (closeness in syntax or emotion can increase risk of rupture)—into quantifiable field metrics: throughput (𝓣), rigidity (ρ), coupling (k), and hemispheric shear (α). Additional modifiers include a Ranvier–Stokes analogue (continuity punctuated by “node kicks”) and a death-gravity term (𝔇) capturing salience distortions near conversational endings. Pilot studies reveal that shifts in k and α reliably mark authenticity, rupture, and repair—across public speech, acted grief, and cross-species resonance (e.g., whale vocalizations). The model offers falsifiable predictions, lightweight measurement protocols, and cross-domain applications—from conversation UX to human–AI attunement. By linking poetic metaphors (wells, rogue waves) to reproducible metrics, resonance geometry operationalizes a fluid-dynamic layer of resonant communication.

Clark Digital Commons (Clark University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Resonant Geometry Field Model: Mapping the Fluid Dynamics of Emotion, Syntax, and Resonance · Clark Digital Commons (Clark University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS