The United States Offshore Balancing in the South China Sea Dispute (2017 – 2021)

The debates about geopolitical competition between major powers in this multipolar world will always consider the presence of the United States and the rise of China. Therefore, this study attempts to examine the implementation of the United States' offshore balancing, especially in the Donald Trump Administration, to contain China in the South China Sea dispute. Although there were previous studies that discuss the United States – China strategic competition in the South China Sea, the time span is limited until 2017, and has not yet reached the specifications for the implementation of the offshore balancing by the United States. Therefore, this study will use the offshore balancing theory to identify the reasons for the United States’ deterrence against China. This study will use qualitative–deductive methods and triangulation data analysis techniques from official documents and statements, previous research, or internet sources. This study found that China's assertiveness in the South China Sea has caused the implementation of United States’ offshore balancing regardless of geographical distance. Guided by the Freedom of Navigation Operations that escalated during Trump’s, offshore balancing was implemented by encouraging other countries to control China in the South China Sea dispute, and to intervene only when necessary.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS)
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v5i1.1720
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The United States Offshore Balancing in the South China Sea Dispute (2017 – 2021)

International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

The United States Offshore Balancing in the South China Sea Dispute (2017 – 2021)

article en

Abstract

The debates about geopolitical competition between major powers in this multipolar world will always consider the presence of the United States and the rise of China. Therefore, this study attempts to examine the implementation of the United States' offshore balancing, especially in the Donald Trump Administration, to contain China in the South China Sea dispute. Although there were previous studies that discuss the United States – China strategic competition in the South China Sea, the time span is limited until 2017, and has not yet reached the specifications for the implementation of the offshore balancing by the United States. Therefore, this study will use the offshore balancing theory to identify the reasons for the United States’ deterrence against China. This study will use qualitative–deductive methods and triangulation data analysis techniques from official documents and statements, previous research, or internet sources. This study found that China's assertiveness in the South China Sea has caused the implementation of United States’ offshore balancing regardless of geographical distance. Guided by the Freedom of Navigation Operations that escalated during Trump’s, offshore balancing was implemented by encouraging other countries to control China in the South China Sea dispute, and to intervene only when necessary.

International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS)Vol. 5(1)
University of Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.