Methodological guide: "Internal Validity Criteria" grounded in the TCCR

This methodological guide presents the "Internal Validity Criteria" of the Cognosystemic Theory of Human Psychosocial Relational Construction (TCCR) as an endogenous epistemic standard for Social Work. Structured around an operational triad—Inter-level Coherence, Relational Effectiveness, and Relational Justice—the guide offers a verifiable framework for judging the quality of diagnoses, decisions, and interventions from the unit of analysis, the Cognosystem (micro–meso–macro). Validation is operationalized through equivalent instruments—the Meaning Circulation Map (MCM), Mediation Bridges (MB), and the Cognosystemic Decision Chain (CDC)—and a Validation Matrix that applies the "strong-minimum" rule across four planes: traceability (Data→Meaning→Decision→Effect), inter-level alignment, selected indicators, and observable effects. The document includes a step-by-step procedure (with guiding questions), templates for hypotheses and design, and the ICOR indicators (trust, coordination, recognition, conflict management) and VIRE (Voice–Influence–Recognition–Ethics Plan), together with three complete cases (school, neighborhood, workplace organization) that illustrate use, measurement, and loop closures. Its purpose is to build cumulative, endogenous knowledge, enhance disciplinary credibility, and structure practice without bureaucratizing it, offering transparent, auditable, and transferable criteria for professional teams, students, and researchers who intervene from the TCCR perspective.Get the book on Amazon: "Cognosystemic Theory of Human Psychosocial Relational Construction TCCR: A unified theoretical proposal for Social Work"

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17128472
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodological guide: "Internal Validity Criteria" grounded in the TCCR

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Methodological guide: "Internal Validity Criteria" grounded in the TCCR

article en

Abstract

This methodological guide presents the "Internal Validity Criteria" of the Cognosystemic Theory of Human Psychosocial Relational Construction (TCCR) as an endogenous epistemic standard for Social Work. Structured around an operational triad—Inter-level Coherence, Relational Effectiveness, and Relational Justice—the guide offers a verifiable framework for judging the quality of diagnoses, decisions, and interventions from the unit of analysis, the Cognosystem (micro–meso–macro). Validation is operationalized through equivalent instruments—the Meaning Circulation Map (MCM), Mediation Bridges (MB), and the Cognosystemic Decision Chain (CDC)—and a Validation Matrix that applies the "strong-minimum" rule across four planes: traceability (Data→Meaning→Decision→Effect), inter-level alignment, selected indicators, and observable effects. The document includes a step-by-step procedure (with guiding questions), templates for hypotheses and design, and the ICOR indicators (trust, coordination, recognition, conflict management) and VIRE (Voice–Influence–Recognition–Ethics Plan), together with three complete cases (school, neighborhood, workplace organization) that illustrate use, measurement, and loop closures. Its purpose is to build cumulative, endogenous knowledge, enhance disciplinary credibility, and structure practice without bureaucratizing it, offering transparent, auditable, and transferable criteria for professional teams, students, and researchers who intervene from the TCCR perspective.Get the book on Amazon: "Cognosystemic Theory of Human Psychosocial Relational Construction TCCR: A unified theoretical proposal for Social Work"

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.