Beyond the Rainbow: Aligning Hydrogen Color Codes with CO₂Emissions for a Transparent Energy Transition

Hydrogen is promoted as an essential building block in the energy transition, yet color codes used to describe its production pathways lack consistency.Color labels (e.g., green, blue, grey, black) are adopted in policy and industry discourse but fail to reflect carbon dioxide emissions.This article examines color classifications, building on an existing framework by expanding it through a qualitative assessment of recent literature.It analyzes how various production technologiesincluding water electrolysis powered by renewables, steam methane reforming, coal gasification, and nuclear-based processes -are labeled.Findings reveal significant inconsistencies, particularly for fossil-based and nuclear hydrogen, and highlight that renewable-based hydrogen is uniformly classified as green regardless of production specifics.The analysis suggests that if color codes were reassigned based on actual emissions, fossil-derived hydrogen would fall into a narrower, darker spectrum.These results call into question the compatibility of non-green hydrogen with climate objectives of the Paris Agreement.

Publication Details

Journal
Ovidius University Annals Economic Sciences Series
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61801/ouaess.2025.1.28
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the Rainbow: Aligning Hydrogen Color Codes with CO₂Emissions for a Transparent Energy Transition

Ovidius University Annals Economic Sciences Series
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Beyond the Rainbow: Aligning Hydrogen Color Codes with CO₂Emissions for a Transparent Energy Transition

article en

Abstract

Hydrogen is promoted as an essential building block in the energy transition, yet color codes used to describe its production pathways lack consistency.Color labels (e.g., green, blue, grey, black) are adopted in policy and industry discourse but fail to reflect carbon dioxide emissions.This article examines color classifications, building on an existing framework by expanding it through a qualitative assessment of recent literature.It analyzes how various production technologiesincluding water electrolysis powered by renewables, steam methane reforming, coal gasification, and nuclear-based processes -are labeled.Findings reveal significant inconsistencies, particularly for fossil-based and nuclear hydrogen, and highlight that renewable-based hydrogen is uniformly classified as green regardless of production specifics.The analysis suggests that if color codes were reassigned based on actual emissions, fossil-derived hydrogen would fall into a narrower, darker spectrum.These results call into question the compatibility of non-green hydrogen with climate objectives of the Paris Agreement.

Ovidius University Annals Economic Sciences SeriesVol. 25(1)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.