Current E‑Procurement Platforms (2020–2025): A Systematic Review of Architectures, Capabilities, and Implementation Outcomes

The evolution of e-procurement has moved beyond isolated digitisation projects to comprehensive, platform-based suites that bundle together e-tendering and sourcing, procure-to-pay (P2P), contract-lifecycle management (CLM), automated accounts payable, supplier-risk and sustainability tools, and advanced analytics. Extending the 2020 systematic review that mapped the barriers to public-sector adoption through the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework, this paper consolidates research published after 2020 to describe today’s platform ecosystem and to assess whether emerging capabilities—cloud-native hosting, mobile interfaces, API-first integration, and especially artificial intelligence (AI)-have removed longstanding obstacles or simply transformed them. Following PRISMA-2020, we detail our protocol, search strategy, screening, quality appraisal, and data-extraction methods, capturing both quantitative and qualitative evidence on system functionalities, integration approaches, performance outcomes (shorter cycle times, higher compliance, greater transparency, enhanced supplier enablement, and more robust sustainability reporting), and persistent challenges (integration debt, skill gaps, governance alignment, and regulatory constraints). The synthesis shows a strong consensus that the quality of integration and data stewardship are still the pivotal factors for unlocking value; AI-driven features are becoming more common but are assessed unevenly; and differences between public and private sector governance and implementation speed remain pronounced. We finish by outlining a research agenda that calls for rigorous comparative studies, clearer AI governance frameworks, better cross-platform interoperability, and reliable ESG data pipelines.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17123341
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current E‑Procurement Platforms (2020–2025): A Systematic Review of Architectures, Capabilities, and Implementation Outcomes

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Current E‑Procurement Platforms (2020–2025): A Systematic Review of Architectures, Capabilities, and Implementation Outcomes

article en

Abstract

The evolution of e-procurement has moved beyond isolated digitisation projects to comprehensive, platform-based suites that bundle together e-tendering and sourcing, procure-to-pay (P2P), contract-lifecycle management (CLM), automated accounts payable, supplier-risk and sustainability tools, and advanced analytics. Extending the 2020 systematic review that mapped the barriers to public-sector adoption through the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework, this paper consolidates research published after 2020 to describe today’s platform ecosystem and to assess whether emerging capabilities—cloud-native hosting, mobile interfaces, API-first integration, and especially artificial intelligence (AI)-have removed longstanding obstacles or simply transformed them. Following PRISMA-2020, we detail our protocol, search strategy, screening, quality appraisal, and data-extraction methods, capturing both quantitative and qualitative evidence on system functionalities, integration approaches, performance outcomes (shorter cycle times, higher compliance, greater transparency, enhanced supplier enablement, and more robust sustainability reporting), and persistent challenges (integration debt, skill gaps, governance alignment, and regulatory constraints). The synthesis shows a strong consensus that the quality of integration and data stewardship are still the pivotal factors for unlocking value; AI-driven features are becoming more common but are assessed unevenly; and differences between public and private sector governance and implementation speed remain pronounced. We finish by outlining a research agenda that calls for rigorous comparative studies, clearer AI governance frameworks, better cross-platform interoperability, and reliable ESG data pipelines.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gopalganj Science and Technology University (BD), University of Frontier Technology, Bangladesh (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.