Comparative Study of Operative Complications in Diabetic & Non-Diabetic Individuals in Adult Age Group After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard treatment for symptomatic gallstone disease. However, diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, including surgical site infections (SSIs), delayed wound healing, and prolonged recovery. In Pakistan, where both gallstone disease and diabetes have a high prevalence, limited research has been conducted on the impact of diabetes on surgical outcomes following LC. This study aims to compare operative complications in diabetic and non-diabetic individuals undergoing LC in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted at the tertiary care hospital from April 2024 to September 2024. A total of 90 adult patients undergoing elective LC were enrolled and categorized into two groups: diabetics (n = 45) and non-diabetics (n = 45). Preoperative evaluation included fasting blood sugar, HbA1c, and imaging assessments. Intraoperative parameters such as operative time, bleeding, and gallbladder perforation were recorded. Postoperative complications, including SSIs, bile leakage, postoperative bleeding, hospital stay, and readmission rates, were monitored. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Diabetic patients had significantly longer operative times (48.6 ± 10.2 minutes vs. 42.3 ± 9.5 minutes, p=0.01) and higher intraoperative blood loss compared to non-diabetics. Postoperative SSIs were more frequent in diabetics (24.4% vs. 8.9%, p=0.04), as were readmissions within 30 days (15.6% vs. 4.4%, p=0.03). The mean hospital stay was longer in diabetics (3.8 ± 1.2 days vs. 2.9 ± 0.9 days, p=0.02), and return to normal activities was delayed (10.5 ± 2.4 days vs. 7.9 ± 2.1 days, p=0.01). The overall incidence of bile leakage and postoperative bleeding was higher in diabetic patients, though not statistically significant. Conclusion: Diabetic patients undergoing LC are at a significantly higher risk of prolonged operative times, increased SSIs, longer hospital stays, and delayed recovery compared to non-diabetic individuals. These findings highlight the need for strict perioperative glycemic control, optimized surgical techniques, and extended postoperative monitoring in diabetic patients. Given the rising prevalence of diabetes in Pakistan, implementing targeted strategies to minimize perioperative complications in diabetic individuals is crucial for improving surgical outcomes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i6.1564
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Operative Complications in Diabetic & Non-Diabetic Individuals in Adult Age Group After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Comparative Study of Operative Complications in Diabetic & Non-Diabetic Individuals in Adult Age Group After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

article en

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard treatment for symptomatic gallstone disease. However, diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, including surgical site infections (SSIs), delayed wound healing, and prolonged recovery. In Pakistan, where both gallstone disease and diabetes have a high prevalence, limited research has been conducted on the impact of diabetes on surgical outcomes following LC. This study aims to compare operative complications in diabetic and non-diabetic individuals undergoing LC in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted at the tertiary care hospital from April 2024 to September 2024. A total of 90 adult patients undergoing elective LC were enrolled and categorized into two groups: diabetics (n = 45) and non-diabetics (n = 45). Preoperative evaluation included fasting blood sugar, HbA1c, and imaging assessments. Intraoperative parameters such as operative time, bleeding, and gallbladder perforation were recorded. Postoperative complications, including SSIs, bile leakage, postoperative bleeding, hospital stay, and readmission rates, were monitored. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Diabetic patients had significantly longer operative times (48.6 ± 10.2 minutes vs. 42.3 ± 9.5 minutes, p=0.01) and higher intraoperative blood loss compared to non-diabetics. Postoperative SSIs were more frequent in diabetics (24.4% vs. 8.9%, p=0.04), as were readmissions within 30 days (15.6% vs. 4.4%, p=0.03). The mean hospital stay was longer in diabetics (3.8 ± 1.2 days vs. 2.9 ± 0.9 days, p=0.02), and return to normal activities was delayed (10.5 ± 2.4 days vs. 7.9 ± 2.1 days, p=0.01). The overall incidence of bile leakage and postoperative bleeding was higher in diabetic patients, though not statistically significant. Conclusion: Diabetic patients undergoing LC are at a significantly higher risk of prolonged operative times, increased SSIs, longer hospital stays, and delayed recovery compared to non-diabetic individuals. These findings highlight the need for strict perioperative glycemic control, optimized surgical techniques, and extended postoperative monitoring in diabetic patients. Given the rising prevalence of diabetes in Pakistan, implementing targeted strategies to minimize perioperative complications in diabetic individuals is crucial for improving surgical outcomes.

Biological and Clinical Sciences Research JournalVol. 6(6)
Pakistan Army (PK), Combined Military Hospital (PK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.