A Critical Discourse Analysis of Trump’s 2020 “Deal of the Century”: Marginalizing Palestinians and Its Ongoing Impact

This study examines the ideological underpinnings and power dynamics embedded in the President Donald Trump’s 2020 “Deal of the Century” speech, with a specific focus on the marginalization of Palestinians through discourse. Adopting a qualitative interpretive approach, the research is grounded in Fairclough’s (1992) model of Critical Discourse Analysis, which enables a multi-level exploration of how language shapes and sustains social hierarchies. Through lexical, metaphor, and transitivity analyses, the study reveals how the speech constructs Palestinians as passive, irrational, or obstructive, while positively framing Israeli and American actors. These discursive strategies not only reinforce asymmetrical power relations but also work to delegitimize Palestinian political agency within a U.S.-centric peace narrative. The findings contribute to understanding how political discourse functions as a tool of ideological control and geopolitical positioning in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Al-Mubadara
Published
2025-06-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61312/s39z5h74
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Critical Discourse Analysis of Trump’s 2020 “Deal of the Century”: Marginalizing Palestinians and Its Ongoing Impact

Journal of Al-Mubadara
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

A Critical Discourse Analysis of Trump’s 2020 “Deal of the Century”: Marginalizing Palestinians and Its Ongoing Impact

article en

Abstract

This study examines the ideological underpinnings and power dynamics embedded in the President Donald Trump’s 2020 “Deal of the Century” speech, with a specific focus on the marginalization of Palestinians through discourse. Adopting a qualitative interpretive approach, the research is grounded in Fairclough’s (1992) model of Critical Discourse Analysis, which enables a multi-level exploration of how language shapes and sustains social hierarchies. Through lexical, metaphor, and transitivity analyses, the study reveals how the speech constructs Palestinians as passive, irrational, or obstructive, while positively framing Israeli and American actors. These discursive strategies not only reinforce asymmetrical power relations but also work to delegitimize Palestinian political agency within a U.S.-centric peace narrative. The findings contribute to understanding how political discourse functions as a tool of ideological control and geopolitical positioning in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Journal of Al-MubadaraVol. 4(1)
Islamic University of Gaza (PS), Development Initiatives (GB), University of Palestine (PS)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.