One Size Misfits All: The Need for Intersectional Tools in Special Education

This paper is an exploration of the intersectionality of disability, linguistic diversity, and cultural identity in special education policy, focusing on how aspects of identities impact students’ experiences and outcomes. Drawing from the 2016 Office for Civil Rights complaint against the Salt Lake City School District, it highlights the disproportionate representation of English learners in special education and the failure to consider linguistic factors during evaluations, including when determining eligibility for specific learning disability. Using an intersectionality framework (Crenshaw, 1989), the paper proposes a toolkit for educators to reflect on and address these intersectional barriers. The Intersectionality Toolkit encourages critical self-reflection, analysis of school policies, and the development of interventions to reduce intersectional inequities. By addressing cultural discontinuity alongside complex systems, the toolkit helps promote more inclusive practices and policies that support the academic and psychological success of students with disabilities, particularly those who have multiple marginalized aspects of identity.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning Disabilities Research and Practice
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09388982251375487
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One Size Misfits All: The Need for Intersectional Tools in Special Education

Learning Disabilities Research and Practice
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

One Size Misfits All: The Need for Intersectional Tools in Special Education

article en

Abstract

This paper is an exploration of the intersectionality of disability, linguistic diversity, and cultural identity in special education policy, focusing on how aspects of identities impact students’ experiences and outcomes. Drawing from the 2016 Office for Civil Rights complaint against the Salt Lake City School District, it highlights the disproportionate representation of English learners in special education and the failure to consider linguistic factors during evaluations, including when determining eligibility for specific learning disability. Using an intersectionality framework (Crenshaw, 1989), the paper proposes a toolkit for educators to reflect on and address these intersectional barriers. The Intersectionality Toolkit encourages critical self-reflection, analysis of school policies, and the development of interventions to reduce intersectional inequities. By addressing cultural discontinuity alongside complex systems, the toolkit helps promote more inclusive practices and policies that support the academic and psychological success of students with disabilities, particularly those who have multiple marginalized aspects of identity.

Learning Disabilities Research and PracticeVol. 41(1)
William Paterson University (US), Wested (US), Iowa State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.