Conceptual Metaphors in History Discourse

Scientific discourse is characterised by a set of rigid rules, one of which includes minimal use of stylistic devices. However, with the development of conceptual metaphor theory (CMT) by Lakoff and Johnson (1980), metaphor is now regarded as an inseparable part of human cognition and discourse. This enables the examination of scientific texts within the framework of conceptual metaphors. The article aims at: (a) identifying conceptual metaphors and their subtypes in soft sciences, more specifically, in history discourse; (b)determining their functions and value for the language of history. The findings showcased how extensively metaphors are used in scientific language despite analysing only a small number of concepts. As a result of the study, the majority of metaphors described belong to structural and ontological subtypes, including the examples of ontological personification. Relatively few orientational metaphorswere found as well.

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Language & Linguistics
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30845/ijll.v12p1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptual Metaphors in History Discourse

1 citations
International Journal of Language & Linguistics
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
2.48
article

Conceptual Metaphors in History Discourse

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Scientific discourse is characterised by a set of rigid rules, one of which includes minimal use of stylistic devices. However, with the development of conceptual metaphor theory (CMT) by Lakoff and Johnson (1980), metaphor is now regarded as an inseparable part of human cognition and discourse. This enables the examination of scientific texts within the framework of conceptual metaphors. The article aims at: (a) identifying conceptual metaphors and their subtypes in soft sciences, more specifically, in history discourse; (b)determining their functions and value for the language of history. The findings showcased how extensively metaphors are used in scientific language despite analysing only a small number of concepts. As a result of the study, the majority of metaphors described belong to structural and ontological subtypes, including the examples of ontological personification. Relatively few orientational metaphorswere found as well.

International Journal of Language & Linguistics
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.