Social impacts from tourism development in protected areas: Comparing communities in different conservation zones of Wulingyuan World Heritage Site, China

The various functions of protected areas (including conservation and tourism) have increasingly inflicted complex social impacts on local communities. With 702 questionnaires and 101 interviews with local people and officials, this mixed-methods study investigated the social impacts of conservation governance and tourism development in the Wulingyuan World Heritage Site, a globally renowned tourist destination in China. Our quantitative research revealed that many negative social impacts were experienced by local people, although there were some benefits including improvement in social relations, living environment, and education. The negative social impacts related to reduced social equity & empowerment, impacts on livelihoods & wellbeing, and impacts on local culture. Our qualitative research revealed the many concerns of local people, including about loss of land, involuntary resettlement, building restrictions, and inequitable protected area management practices. Together, our quantitative and qualitative results indicated that communities close to the core protection zones experienced more negative impacts, whereas people living in the buffer zones have less concerns. It was very evident that tourism development has not enhanced the wellbeing of people in host communities equally. We conclude that there is need for more inclusive, participatory, and equitable governance and for co-management processes in protected area management. There also needs to be greater recognition of the potential contribution of traditional livelihoods to nature conservation and for a fairer distribution of the benefits arising from tourism. Finally, greater attention should be given to local culture in the governance and management of protected areas and national parks. • Communities closer to core protection zones experience more negative impacts. • Land acquisition for conservation purposes is a major cause of social impacts. • Inequality in regulations and restrictions intensify local grievances. • Tourism development exacerbates social inequity and disempowerment. • Loss of culture from tourism development is an acknowledged but unaddressed issue.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Use Policy
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107753
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social impacts from tourism development in protected areas: Comparing communities in different conservation zones of Wulingyuan World Heritage Site, China

2 citations
Land Use Policy
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
4.96
article

Social impacts from tourism development in protected areas: Comparing communities in different conservation zones of Wulingyuan World Heritage Site, China

article en
2 citations

Abstract

The various functions of protected areas (including conservation and tourism) have increasingly inflicted complex social impacts on local communities. With 702 questionnaires and 101 interviews with local people and officials, this mixed-methods study investigated the social impacts of conservation governance and tourism development in the Wulingyuan World Heritage Site, a globally renowned tourist destination in China. Our quantitative research revealed that many negative social impacts were experienced by local people, although there were some benefits including improvement in social relations, living environment, and education. The negative social impacts related to reduced social equity & empowerment, impacts on livelihoods & wellbeing, and impacts on local culture. Our qualitative research revealed the many concerns of local people, including about loss of land, involuntary resettlement, building restrictions, and inequitable protected area management practices. Together, our quantitative and qualitative results indicated that communities close to the core protection zones experienced more negative impacts, whereas people living in the buffer zones have less concerns. It was very evident that tourism development has not enhanced the wellbeing of people in host communities equally. We conclude that there is need for more inclusive, participatory, and equitable governance and for co-management processes in protected area management. There also needs to be greater recognition of the potential contribution of traditional livelihoods to nature conservation and for a fairer distribution of the benefits arising from tourism. Finally, greater attention should be given to local culture in the governance and management of protected areas and national parks. • Communities closer to core protection zones experience more negative impacts. • Land acquisition for conservation purposes is a major cause of social impacts. • Inequality in regulations and restrictions intensify local grievances. • Tourism development exacerbates social inequity and disempowerment. • Loss of culture from tourism development is an acknowledged but unaddressed issue.

Land Use PolicyVol. 158
University of Groningen (NL)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.