Evaluation of Project Stage of a Gifted Program in Terms of Perceptions regarding Collaborative Problem-Solving Experiences: A Novice-Experienced Study

This study aimed to examine the current perceptions of gifted students (n=178) on using collaborative problem solving during projects and to compare their experiences with those of experienced individuals (n=105) on projects. The research method of the study is the quantitative comparative method. Three data collection tools were used: the CPSS scale for gifted students and experienced individuals, Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale, and Collective Orientation Scale (COS). For analyzing the data, principal components analysis, calculating descriptive statistics, regression, and t-tests for independent groups were used. Regression analysis showed that there was a significant relationship between CPSS and COS scores of the students and the experienced individuals in collaborative problem-solving in a project. The findings indicated that gifted students do not have similar perceptions to experienced individuals. Experienced individuals have more positive perceptions regarding CPSS and COS. Findings showed the necessity of evaluating the project activities provided in a gifted education program in terms of CPSS in detail.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals
Published
2024-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.563
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Project Stage of a Gifted Program in Terms of Perceptions regarding Collaborative Problem-Solving Experiences: A Novice-Experienced Study

Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Evaluation of Project Stage of a Gifted Program in Terms of Perceptions regarding Collaborative Problem-Solving Experiences: A Novice-Experienced Study

article en

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the current perceptions of gifted students (n=178) on using collaborative problem solving during projects and to compare their experiences with those of experienced individuals (n=105) on projects. The research method of the study is the quantitative comparative method. Three data collection tools were used: the CPSS scale for gifted students and experienced individuals, Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale, and Collective Orientation Scale (COS). For analyzing the data, principal components analysis, calculating descriptive statistics, regression, and t-tests for independent groups were used. Regression analysis showed that there was a significant relationship between CPSS and COS scores of the students and the experienced individuals in collaborative problem-solving in a project. The findings indicated that gifted students do not have similar perceptions to experienced individuals. Experienced individuals have more positive perceptions regarding CPSS and COS. Findings showed the necessity of evaluating the project activities provided in a gifted education program in terms of CPSS in detail.

Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.