Do daily leader and colleague behaviours matter for work effort? The role of daily basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration

Purpose Drawing on self-determination theory, this paper examines whether daily need-supportive versus need-thwarting behaviours from leaders and colleagues independently predict employees’ work effort through daily need satisfaction and frustration. Design/methodology/approach In total, 68 South African employees completed daily diaries for 10 days (557 days-level observations). The data were analysed using multilevel structural equation modelling. Findings The results revealed a dual-process model in which daily need-supportive behaviours of the leader and colleagues independently boosted work effort via need satisfaction. Daily need-thwarting behaviours were negatively related to work effort via need frustration. Both sources of interpersonal behaviours mattered for need-based experiences, but daily need satisfaction showed a stronger association with work effort than daily need frustration. Practical implications Organisations should prioritise interventions to enhance daily need-supportive interactions for colleagues and leaders. Originality/value This study is among the first to isolate the within-person impacts of vertical and horizontal need-related behaviours – capturing both the “bright” (supportive) and “dark” (thwarting) sides – in the South African context.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Managerial Psychology
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-06-2023-0361
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do daily leader and colleague behaviours matter for work effort? The role of daily basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration

Journal of Managerial Psychology
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Do daily leader and colleague behaviours matter for work effort? The role of daily basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration

article en

Abstract

Purpose Drawing on self-determination theory, this paper examines whether daily need-supportive versus need-thwarting behaviours from leaders and colleagues independently predict employees’ work effort through daily need satisfaction and frustration. Design/methodology/approach In total, 68 South African employees completed daily diaries for 10 days (557 days-level observations). The data were analysed using multilevel structural equation modelling. Findings The results revealed a dual-process model in which daily need-supportive behaviours of the leader and colleagues independently boosted work effort via need satisfaction. Daily need-thwarting behaviours were negatively related to work effort via need frustration. Both sources of interpersonal behaviours mattered for need-based experiences, but daily need satisfaction showed a stronger association with work effort than daily need frustration. Practical implications Organisations should prioritise interventions to enhance daily need-supportive interactions for colleagues and leaders. Originality/value This study is among the first to isolate the within-person impacts of vertical and horizontal need-related behaviours – capturing both the “bright” (supportive) and “dark” (thwarting) sides – in the South African context.

Journal of Managerial PsychologyVol. 41(1)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), North-West University (ZA), KU Leuven (BE)
National Research Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.