The “T+1” Trading Rule and Put‐Call Disparity in China

ABSTRACT This article investigates how the “T+1” trading rule affects put‐call disparity (PCD) in the Chinese market. The Chinese stock market is subject to the unique “T+1” trading rule, while the options market is not. This provides a valuable opportunity to study the impact of the selling constraint imposed by this rule. We construct synthetic ETFs and measure the levels of PCDs. PCDs of all underlying ETFs are significantly higher at the market's open than at its close and exhibit a downward intraday trend. Moreover, the differences in PCDs between the market's open and close are highly correlated with the underlying ETFs' volatility, speculative trading activity, and limits to arbitrage. We further confirm our results by analyzing overnight and intraday returns of the synthetic and underlying ETFs, as well as the bases of stock index futures. We highlight the significant influence of trading mechanisms on asset price formation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Futures Markets
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.70039
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The “T+1” Trading Rule and Put‐Call Disparity in China

Journal of Futures Markets
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

The “T+1” Trading Rule and Put‐Call Disparity in China

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article investigates how the “T+1” trading rule affects put‐call disparity (PCD) in the Chinese market. The Chinese stock market is subject to the unique “T+1” trading rule, while the options market is not. This provides a valuable opportunity to study the impact of the selling constraint imposed by this rule. We construct synthetic ETFs and measure the levels of PCDs. PCDs of all underlying ETFs are significantly higher at the market's open than at its close and exhibit a downward intraday trend. Moreover, the differences in PCDs between the market's open and close are highly correlated with the underlying ETFs' volatility, speculative trading activity, and limits to arbitrage. We further confirm our results by analyzing overnight and intraday returns of the synthetic and underlying ETFs, as well as the bases of stock index futures. We highlight the significant influence of trading mechanisms on asset price formation.

Journal of Futures MarketsVol. 45(12)
Jimei University (CN), Xiamen University (CN), Fuzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.